Sierra Cables Plc (SCP) is
a subsidiary of Sierra Group
Introduction
Accounting
is an art of identifying summarizing and analyzing an entity's financial
transactions. . Accounting also plays an important role in providing useful
information for its users. Effective use of this tool will lead to
efficient resource allocation.
At
present Accounting plays a dominant role in the economy. it provides signals to
resource allocators and decision makers to use their resources more
efficiently. Accounting helps an investor to understand the following,
- The potential of the firm ( Trend analysis)
- Current position of the firm (Statement of Financial Position)
- Current Performance of the firm (Income Statement)
- Opportunity cost of the Investment ( Comparing with other firms)
- The optimum output/sales (Management Account)
Identifying
the importance and possibility of manipulation, many economies has
developed accounting regulatory bodies and standards. These
standards ensures uniformity in reporting and enables its users to
generate more information and for efficient resource allocation by
weighing the opportunity cost.
Company
Sierra
Cables Plc (SCP) is a subsidiary of Sierra Group -a conglomerate operation in
diverse section of Sri Lanka, was established on 1999 as Alcups Cables and was
subsequently listed in Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE) in 2005.
SCP
has established a strong brand name as the complete and comprehensive wire
and cable supplier for Industrial specific power cables with national and
international presence.
Being
awarded with many awards such as Gold award at CNCI Industrial excellence
in 2009, Quality Crown Award in 2010, Best cable Manufacture of the Year
in 2011 and NEC Export award for 2017 has expanded its operation
rapidly. In 2011 Started its fully owned subsidiary Sierra Industries to
produce PVC Pipes and in 2015 started operation in African region
under the name Sierra Cables East Africa Ltd.
The Importance of Financial Statement Analysis.
Financial
Statement analysis can be described as a process of using financial statements
and other related information, to evaluate whether the is business creating
value.
It
is with utmost importance that an investor should analyze these statements to
make efficient decisions. The outcome of these analysis will provide
meaningful information as to how the investor should allocate resources. Or in
other words financial statement analysis can be referred as a process of
understanding the risk and profitability of a company, i.e. to predict the
future and the value of the company with the past performance.
Income statement of Sierra Cables PLC
Year
|
|||||
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
Sales
|
2,137,572,003
|
3,276,059,072
|
2,865,490,013
|
3,724,981,774
|
3,839,979,820
|
Cost of Sales
|
(1,834,518,102)
|
(2,540,699,016)
|
(2,240,987,288)
|
(2,880,335,542)
|
(3,260,481,855)
|
Gross Profit
|
303,053,901
|
735,360,056
|
624,502,725
|
844,646,232
|
579,497,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income
|
39,705,634
|
120,175,889
|
50,991,533
|
26,902,525
|
10,725,060
|
Selling and Distribution
|
(145,212,139)
|
(182,745,365)
|
(167,281,847)
|
(213,485,628)
|
(227,006,387)
|
Administrative Expenses
|
(141,289,774)
|
(88,674,193)
|
(99,869,814)
|
(155,481,754)
|
(144,458,472)
|
Other operating Expenses
|
(272,616,894)
|
(91,936,723)
|
(66,500,000)
|
(57,500,000)
|
(100,117,309)
|
Profit from Operations
|
(216,359,272)
|
492,179,664
|
341,842,597
|
445,081,375
|
118,640,857
|
Net financial cost
|
(137,248,148)
|
(90,366,488)
|
(86,557,006)
|
(123,600,270)
|
(154,366,889)
|
Profit before Tax
|
(353,607,420)
|
401,813,176
|
255,285,591
|
321,481,105
|
(35,726,032)
|
Tax
|
83,541,215
|
(98,036,861)
|
(79,364,029)
|
(81,809,721)
|
(17,509,657)
|
Net Profit
|
(270,066,205)
|
303,776,315
|
175,921,562
|
239,671,384
|
(53,235,689)
|
Balance Sheet of Sierra Cables Plc
ASSETS
|
Year
|
||||
Non-Current
Assets
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
Property, Plant
& Equipment
|
890,561,492
|
883,363,592
|
868,763,794
|
818,344,603
|
1,060,155,597
|
intangible
Assets
|
2,087,725
|
1,609,497
|
1,269,421
|
6,859,050
|
8,900,757
|
Investment
property
|
14,784,299
|
13,962,949
|
-
|
-
|
4,500,000
|
Investment in
subsidiaries
|
160,680,020
|
215,280,020
|
182,060,020
|
160,522,720
|
180,255,175
|
Investments in
equity accounted investees
|
5,800,000
|
5,800,000
|
5,800,000
|
3,300,000
|
31,610,163
|
Other Financial
Assets - Non current
|
112,951,573
|
30,263,993
|
44,755,691
|
29,142,315
|
56,433,863
|
Long term loans
Receivable
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
119,616,300
|
Total
Non-Current Assets
|
1,186,865,109
|
1,150,280,051
|
1,102,648,926
|
1,018,168,688
|
1,461,471,855
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
564,953,048
|
557,877,848
|
653,626,097
|
1,160,345,333
|
893,039,653
|
Trade &
Other Receivables
|
786,108,741
|
829,782,494
|
863,144,766
|
1,362,539,188
|
1,545,555,346
|
Tax Receivable
|
15,830,737
|
-
|
8,333,948
|
-
|
9,089,911
|
Due from Related
Parties
|
136,999,606
|
305,072,505
|
303,227,360
|
398,554,835
|
370,676,631
|
Assets
Classified as held for sale
|
21,000,000
|
18,000,000
|
18,000,000
|
18,000,000
|
-
|
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
10,257,327
|
42,405,237
|
73,005,443
|
73,481,406
|
310,476,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current
Assets
|
1,535,149,459
|
1,753,138,084
|
1,919,337,614
|
3,012,920,762
|
3,128,838,360
|
Total Assets
|
2,722,014,568
|
2,903,418,135
|
3,021,986,540
|
4,031,089,450
|
4,590,310,215
|
EQUITY &
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated Capital
|
894,565,898
|
894,565,898
|
894,565,898
|
894,565,898
|
894,565,898
|
Revaluation
Reserve
|
332,938,932
|
332,938,932
|
332,938,932
|
332,938,932
|
512,732,913
|
Fair value
Reserve
|
87,812,815
|
19,014,532
|
17,722,832
|
17,892,855
|
19,262,801
|
Retained
Earnings
|
93,828,558
|
289,487,666
|
359,026,151
|
465,840,114
|
388,302,660
|
Total Equity
|
1,409,146,203
|
1,536,007,028
|
1,604,253,813
|
1,711,237,799
|
1,814,864,272
|
Non-Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing
Borrowings
|
101,531,141
|
122,874,931
|
106,604,820
|
56,613,998
|
22,371,998
|
Deferred Tax
|
68,355,089
|
108,788,382
|
160,774,382
|
148,620,754
|
225,591,082
|
Retirement
Benefits Obligation
|
21,624,714
|
26,282,368
|
25,929,429
|
27,528,994
|
41,133,228
|
Total
Non-Current Liabilities
|
191,510,944
|
257,945,681
|
293,308,631
|
232,763,746
|
289,096,308
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade &
Other Payables
|
336,227,201
|
269,231,296
|
305,965,657
|
861,280,484
|
887,819,888
|
Amount Due to
Related Parties
|
|
-
|
-
|
91,400
|
43,913
|
Maturity of
Long-Term Loans
|
46,481,268
|
59,620,756
|
68,818,200
|
48,646,677
|
192,242,000
|
Short trem loans
|
678,146,734
|
730,653,350
|
714,097,468
|
1,065,874,913
|
1,229,918,031
|
Tax payable
|
|
49,960,024
|
-
|
73,512,534
|
-
|
Bank Overdrafts
|
60,502,218
|
-
|
35,542,771
|
37,681,897
|
176,325,800
|
Total Current
Liabilities
|
1,121,357,421
|
1,109,465,426
|
1,124,424,096
|
2,087,087,905
|
2,486,349,632
|
Total Equity
& Liabilities
|
2,722,014,568
|
2,903,418,135
|
3,021,986,540
|
4,031,089,450
|
4,590,310,212
|
Tools used for Financial Statement analysis
-
Horizontal Analysis
-
Trend Analysis
-
Vertical Analysis
-
Ratio Analysis
Horizontal Analysis
Horizontal Analysis can be described as process of comparing
past financial statements of a single company. i.e. Calculating relative change
in the financial statements based on a past year performance. This provides
general indication of the company’s performance. These variation helps an
investor to understand the trend of the business’s performance.
Income Statement
Year
|
|||||
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
Sales
|
2,137,572,003
|
3,276,059,072
|
2,865,490,013
|
3,724,981,774
|
3,839,979,820
|
Cost of Sales
|
(1,834,518,102)
|
(2,540,699,016)
|
(2,240,987,288)
|
(2,880,335,542)
|
(3,260,481,855)
|
Gross
Profit
|
303,053,901
|
735,360,056
|
624,502,725
|
844,646,232
|
579,497,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income
|
39,705,634
|
120,175,889
|
50,991,533
|
26,902,525
|
10,725,060
|
Selling and Distribution
|
(145,212,139)
|
(182,745,365)
|
(167,281,847)
|
(213,485,628)
|
(227,006,387)
|
Administrative Expenses
|
(141,289,774)
|
(88,674,193)
|
(99,869,814)
|
(155,481,754)
|
(144,458,472)
|
Other operating Expenses
|
(272,616,894)
|
(91,936,723)
|
(66,500,000)
|
(57,500,000)
|
(100,117,309)
|
Profit from Operations
|
(216,359,272)
|
492,179,664
|
341,842,597
|
445,081,375
|
118,640,857
|
Net financial cost
|
(137,248,148)
|
(90,366,488)
|
(86,557,006)
|
(123,600,270)
|
(154,366,889)
|
Profit
before Tax
|
(353,607,420)
|
401,813,176
|
255,285,591
|
321,481,105
|
(35,726,032)
|
Tax
|
83,541,215
|
(98,036,861)
|
(79,364,029)
|
(81,809,721)
|
(17,509,657)
|
Net
Profit
|
(270,066,205)
|
303,776,315
|
175,921,562
|
239,671,384
|
(53,235,689)
|
Base Year
2015
|
Value
change 2016
|
% change
|
Value
change 2017
|
% change
|
Value
change 2018
|
% change
|
Sales
|
(410,569,059)
|
-12.5%
|
448,922,702
|
13.7%
|
563,920,748
|
17.2%
|
Cost of Sales
|
(299,711,728)
|
11.8%
|
339,636,526
|
-13.4%
|
719,782,839
|
-28.3%
|
Gross Profit
|
(110,857,331)
|
-15.1%
|
109,286,176
|
14.9%
|
(155,862,091)
|
-21.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income
|
(69,184,356)
|
-57.6%
|
(93,273,364)
|
-77.6%
|
(109,450,829)
|
-91.1%
|
Selling and Distribution
|
(15,463,518)
|
8.5%
|
30,740,263
|
-16.8%
|
44,261,022
|
-24.2%
|
Administrative Expenses
|
11,195,621
|
-12.6%
|
66,807,561
|
-75.3%
|
55,784,279
|
-62.9%
|
Other operating Expenses
|
(25,436,723)
|
27.7%
|
(34,436,723)
|
37.5%
|
8,180,586
|
-8.9%
|
Profit from Operations
|
(150,337,067)
|
-30.5%
|
(47,098,289)
|
-9.6%
|
(373,538,807)
|
-75.9%
|
Net financial cost
|
(3,809,482)
|
4.2%
|
33,233,782
|
-36.8%
|
64,000,401
|
-70.8%
|
Profit before Tax
|
(146,527,585)
|
-36.5%
|
(80,332,071)
|
-20.0%
|
(437,539,208)
|
-108.9%
|
Tax
|
(18,672,832)
|
19.0%
|
(16,227,140)
|
16.6%
|
(80,527,204)
|
82.1%
|
Net Profit
|
(127,854,753)
|
-42.1%
|
(64,104,931)
|
-21.1%
|
(357,012,004)
|
-117.5%
|
Interpretation
When Considering a horizontal analysis for Sierra cables
Plc, the company has performed negatively in the year 2014. For Horizontal
Analysis if 2014 is considered as the base year, the illustration will mislead
the users as it interprets high positive values due to the poor performance in
the base year. Therefore considered 2015 as the base year since the company
performed substantially well compared to previous years.
When considering the performance interms of profitability,
it is visible that the company has not made any growth. The company’s sales
have grown in year 2017 and 2018 by 13.7% and 17.2% respectively. Despite the
growth in sales it is also visible that the cost of sales also increased
leading to a decrease in gross profit. In year 2016 sales has decreased by
12.5% and the cost of sales has decreased by 11.8% resulting a net effect of
15.1% decrease in gross profit. In 2017 and 2018 there is an increase in sales
and cost of sales. In 2017 sales as increased by 13.7% and the cost of sales
has increased by 13.4% but the Gross profit has improved by 14.9%. Due to
increase in import levy on plastic and rubber in 2018 the cost of sales has
increased by 28.3% leading to a decrease in gross profit by 21.2%.
Other income of the company is mainly derived by security
trading and investments. Due to recent past decline in the market the company
is not active in trading leading to a rapid decrease in other income (91.1%
decrease in 2018 compared to 2015).
Overall operating cost of the organization i.e. Selling and
distribution, Administrative expense and other expense has increased over the
years in consideration. In year 2016 and 2017 the company has managed to
decrease other expenses compared to 2015.
Despite increase in taxation it is visible that the company
has underperformed in comparison to 2015 performance.
Balance Sheet
Base Year
2015
|
Year
|
||||||||
Non-Current
Assets
|
2016
|
Change
|
2017
|
Change
|
2018
|
Change
|
|||
Property, Plant
& Equipment
|
(14,599,798)
|
-1.7%
|
(65,018,989)
|
-7.4%
|
176,792,005
|
20.0%
|
|||
intangible
Assets
|
(340,076)
|
-21.1%
|
5,249,553
|
326.2%
|
7,291,260
|
453.0%
|
|||
Investment
property
|
(13,962,949)
|
-100.0%
|
(13,962,949)
|
-100.0%
|
(9,462,949)
|
-67.8%
|
|||
Investment in
subsidiaries
|
(33,220,000)
|
-15.4%
|
(54,757,300)
|
-25.4%
|
(35,024,845)
|
-16.3%
|
|||
Investments in
equity accounted investees
|
0
|
0.0%
|
(2,500,000)
|
-43.1%
|
25,810,163
|
445.0%
|
|||
Other Financial
Assets - Non-current
|
14,491,698
|
47.9%
|
(1,121,678)
|
-3.7%
|
26,169,870
|
86.5%
|
|||
Long term loans
Receivable
|
0
|
|
|
|
119,616,300
|
|
|||
Total
Non-Current Assets
|
(47,631,125)
|
-4.1%
|
(132,111,363)
|
-11.5%
|
311,191,804
|
27.1%
|
|||
Current
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Inventories
|
95,748,249
|
17.2%
|
602,467,485
|
108.0%
|
335,161,805
|
60.1%
|
|||
Trade &
Other Receivables
|
33,362,272
|
4.0%
|
532,756,694
|
64.2%
|
715,772,852
|
86.3%
|
|||
Tax Receivable
|
8,333,948
|
|
|
|
9,089,911
|
|
|||
Due from Related
Parties
|
(1,845,145)
|
-0.6%
|
93,482,330
|
30.6%
|
65,604,126
|
21.5%
|
|||
Assets
Classified as held for sale
|
0
|
0.0%
|
0
|
0.0%
|
(18,000,000)
|
-100.0%
|
|||
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
30,600,206
|
72.2%
|
31,076,169
|
73.3%
|
268,071,582
|
632.2%
|
|||
Total Current
Assets
|
166,199,530
|
9.5%
|
1,259,782,678
|
71.9%
|
1,375,700,276
|
78.5%
|
|||
Total Assets
|
118,568,405
|
4.1%
|
1,127,671,315
|
38.8%
|
1,686,892,080
|
58.1%
|
|||
EQUITY &
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Stated Capital
|
0
|
0.0%
|
0
|
0.0%
|
0
|
0.0%
|
|||
Revaluation
Reserve
|
0
|
0.0%
|
0
|
0.0%
|
179,793,981
|
54.0%
|
|||
Fair value
Reserve
|
(1,291,700)
|
-6.8%
|
(1,121,677)
|
-5.9%
|
248,269
|
1.3%
|
|||
Retained
Earnings
|
69,538,485
|
24.0%
|
176,352,448
|
60.9%
|
98,814,994
|
34.1%
|
|||
Total Equity
|
68,246,785
|
4.4%
|
175,230,771
|
11.4%
|
278,857,244
|
18.2%
|
|||
Non-Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest Bearing
Borrowings
|
(16,270,111)
|
-13.2%
|
(66,260,933)
|
-53.9%
|
(100,502,933)
|
-81.8%
|
|||
Deferred Tax
|
51,986,000
|
47.8%
|
39,832,372
|
36.6%
|
116,802,700
|
107.4%
|
|||
Retirement
Benefits Obligation
|
(352,939)
|
-1.3%
|
1,246,626
|
4.7%
|
14,850,860
|
56.5%
|
|||
Total
Non-Current Liabilities
|
35,362,950
|
13.7%
|
(25,181,935)
|
-9.8%
|
31,150,627
|
12.1%
|
|||
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Trade &
Other Payables
|
36,734,361
|
13.6%
|
592,049,188
|
219.9%
|
618,588,592
|
229.8%
|
|||
Amount Due to
Related Parties
|
0
|
|
91,400
|
|
43,913
|
|
|||
Maturity of
Long-Term Loans
|
9,197,444
|
15.4%
|
(10,974,079)
|
-18.4%
|
132,621,244
|
222.4%
|
|||
Short term loans
|
(16,555,882)
|
-2.3%
|
335,221,563
|
45.9%
|
499,264,681
|
68.3%
|
|||
Tax payable
|
(49,960,024)
|
-100.0%
|
23,552,510
|
47.1%
|
(49,960,024)
|
-100.0%
|
|||
Bank Overdrafts
|
35,542,771
|
|
37,681,897
|
|
176,325,800
|
|
|||
Total Current
Liabilities
|
14,958,670
|
1.3%
|
977,622,479
|
88.1%
|
1,376,884,206
|
124.1%
|
|||
Total Equity
& Liabilities
|
118,568,405
|
4.1%
|
1,127,671,315
|
38.8%
|
1,686,892,077
|
58.1%
|
|||
Interpretation
When considering the balance sheet of SCP, it is visible
that the company has not invested much on noncurrent assets during 2016 and
2017, but in 2018 the company has invested on a new plant with new machineries,
which has attributed for the increase in PPE in the balance sheet. The company has also purchased 28.0Mn worth
of Shares of Cable PTE ltd which is displayed under the increase in investments
by 445% in 2018 compared to 2015.
When considering Current assets of the company it displays
that the company has increased investment in stocks and trade and other
receivable relative to the year 2014. It signals positive tread since the company
is needs to expands its working capital gradually in order to expand its
business.
SCP equity composition has not changed which provides a
signal that the company is more towards debt financing for expansion of the
business. The above discussed statement is justified with the increase in
current liabilities of the company. The company has increased its position on
trade and other receivable during 2017 and 2018 to assist its working capital
gap created due to increase in stocks and trade receivables.
Summary
When analyzing horizontal analysis for SCP considering 2015
as the base year, it is visible that the company has underperformed compared to
2015. The company has increase in sales in 2017 and 2018 but has been offset by
increase in cost of sales and other operating expenses.
Horizontal Analysis does not give a clear picture unless a
proper base is identified. It is utmost difficult to determine a base year for
the analysis. As discussed, if 2014 is considered as the base year for
Horizontal analysis the company would have indicated high positive variance
since the company has underperformed in year 2014. And over the period of time
the accounting practice and policies has also changed, which will have
significant impact over the outcome. As such, the company has changed its
policy on treatment of receivable from its Subsidiary, the board has decided to
convert Rs.119.6Mn as of Sierra industry’s current account as long term
receivable and displayed as a non-current asset.
When considering positive treads, it is ambiguous to
understand the true reason for the trend. For the years under consideration it
is visible that the company has increased its stocks and trade and other
receivables, which displays a growth in the business in general. But the
increase may have been caused to increase in inflation, exchange rates or
management practice. Therefore, true reason has to be justified.
Trend Analysis
When analyzing the Income statement of SCP it is visible
that the gross profit as a percentage of 2015 has decreased when compared to increase
in sales. This is due the rise in cost of sales for the period under
consideration. The company has to look into alternatives to bring down the cost
of production (i.e. finding alterative markets or segments, finding cheaper raw
martials).
Due to the decrease in gross profit, the bottom line profits
have come down drastically. The company need to address this situation since
their overall profitability is at stake. In other words, unless the SCP address
this situation the company will run be utilizing its retaining earnings.
When considering the
balance sheet, it is evident that the company has expanded its overall
position. i.e. increase in assets. The company as expanded its assets interms
of current assets by increasing its stocks and receivable position.
When considering the equity and liability position of the
company it is visible that the company is increasing its leverage, that is the
company has financed the growth mainly my debt financing. The increase in
current liability is mainly due to increase in short term bank loan and
increase in payables. The total equity attributed to the owners has not grown
since the company has not made any significant profit from the expansion.
Vertical Analysis
Vertical Analysis is also known as the common size analysis
is renown method of financial statement analysis as it shows all the items of
the financial statement as percentage of the base item (i.e. Sale in income
statement and Total assets in balance sheet)
INCOME STATEMENT
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
Sales
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Cost of Sales
|
85.8%
|
77.6%
|
78.2%
|
77.3%
|
84.9%
|
Gross Profit
|
14.2%
|
22.4%
|
21.8%
|
22.7%
|
15.1%
|
Other Income
|
1.9%
|
3.7%
|
1.8%
|
0.7%
|
0.3%
|
Selling and Distribution
|
6.8%
|
5.6%
|
5.8%
|
5.7%
|
5.9%
|
Administrative Expenses
|
6.6%
|
2.7%
|
3.5%
|
4.2%
|
3.8%
|
Other operating Expenses
|
12.8%
|
2.8%
|
2.3%
|
1.5%
|
2.6%
|
Profit from Operations
|
-10.1%
|
15.0%
|
11.9%
|
11.9%
|
3.1%
|
Net financial cost
|
6.4%
|
2.8%
|
3.0%
|
3.3%
|
4.0%
|
Profit before Tax
|
-16.5%
|
12.3%
|
8.9%
|
8.6%
|
-0.9%
|
Tax
|
3.9%
|
3.0%
|
2.8%
|
2.2%
|
0.5%
|
Net Profit
|
-12.6%
|
9.3%
|
6.1%
|
6.4%
|
-1.4%
|
Interpretation
When considering vertical analysis, it is visible the
composition of the financial statement and displays the efficiency level of the
company. As such it is visible that SCP relatively high cost of sales which
represent above 75% for all five years, which has resulted in very narrow gross
profits. The company is gradually decreasing it expenses over the period of
time and maintains below 12% of the sales but due to increase in borrowing the
company has increased its spending on interest despite in the year 2014 where
the company has not performed.
Interms of profitability as a main performance indicator,
the company has to improve its gross profit. A thin gross profit margin will
weigh more burden on the overall operating cost of the organization. The major
reason for thin Gross profit margin is due to the market cluster SCP is
catering to. SCP is highly concentrating on big projects rather than the
consumer market, which leads to thin margin.
Balance Sheet
ASSETS
|
Year
|
||||
Non-Current
Assets
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
Property, Plant
& Equipment
|
32.7%
|
30.4%
|
28.7%
|
20.3%
|
23.1%
|
intangible
Assets
|
0.1%
|
0.1%
|
0.0%
|
0.2%
|
0.2%
|
Investment
property
|
0.5%
|
0.5%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
0.1%
|
Investment in
subsidiaries
|
5.9%
|
7.4%
|
6.0%
|
4.0%
|
3.9%
|
Investments in
equity accounted investees
|
0.2%
|
0.2%
|
0.2%
|
0.1%
|
0.7%
|
Other Financial
Assets - Non-current
|
4.1%
|
1.0%
|
1.5%
|
0.7%
|
1.2%
|
Long term loans
Receivable
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
2.6%
|
Total
Non-Current Assets
|
43.6%
|
39.6%
|
36.5%
|
25.3%
|
31.8%
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
20.8%
|
19.2%
|
21.6%
|
28.8%
|
19.5%
|
Trade &
Other Receivables
|
28.9%
|
28.6%
|
28.6%
|
33.8%
|
33.7%
|
Tax Receivable
|
0.6%
|
0.0%
|
0.3%
|
0.0%
|
0.2%
|
Due from Related
Parties
|
5.0%
|
10.5%
|
10.0%
|
9.9%
|
8.1%
|
Assets
Classified as held for sale
|
0.8%
|
0.6%
|
0.6%
|
0.4%
|
0.0%
|
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
0.4%
|
1.5%
|
2.4%
|
1.8%
|
6.8%
|
Total Current
Assets
|
56.4%
|
60.4%
|
63.5%
|
74.7%
|
68.2%
|
Total Assets
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated Capital
|
32.9%
|
30.8%
|
29.6%
|
22.2%
|
19.5%
|
Revaluation
Reserve
|
12.2%
|
11.5%
|
11.0%
|
8.3%
|
11.2%
|
Fair value
Reserve
|
3.2%
|
0.7%
|
0.6%
|
0.4%
|
0.4%
|
Retained
Earnings
|
3.4%
|
10.0%
|
11.9%
|
11.6%
|
8.5%
|
Total Equity
|
51.8%
|
52.9%
|
53.1%
|
42.5%
|
39.5%
|
Non-Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing
Borrowings
|
3.7%
|
4.2%
|
3.5%
|
1.4%
|
0.5%
|
Deferred Tax
|
2.5%
|
3.7%
|
5.3%
|
3.7%
|
4.9%
|
Retirement
Benefits Obligation
|
0.8%
|
0.9%
|
0.9%
|
0.7%
|
0.9%
|
Total
Non-Current Liabilities
|
7.0%
|
8.9%
|
9.7%
|
5.8%
|
6.3%
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade &
Other Payables
|
12.4%
|
9.3%
|
10.1%
|
21.4%
|
19.3%
|
Amount Due to
Related Parties
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
Maturity of
Long-Term Loans
|
1.7%
|
2.1%
|
2.3%
|
1.2%
|
4.2%
|
Short term loans
|
24.9%
|
25.2%
|
23.6%
|
26.4%
|
26.8%
|
Tax payable
|
0.0%
|
1.7%
|
0.0%
|
1.8%
|
0.0%
|
Bank Overdrafts
|
2.2%
|
0.0%
|
1.2%
|
0.9%
|
3.8%
|
Total Current
Liabilities
|
41.2%
|
38.2%
|
37.2%
|
51.8%
|
54.2%
|
Total Equity
& Liabilities
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Interpretation
The total assets of the company are distributed in an
optimized level. The composition of 30% Non-current assets to 70% of Current
assets is optimum. Because the company has place has place large amount of its
assets as current which enables it have positive working capital.
Due from related parties displays a decreasing trend over
the five-year period and the company as maintained well below 10% of its assets
as cash, which could emphasis the efficient use of resources.
When considering equity, it is clearly visible the
composition is reducing which shows an indication debt financing. Which is
displayed in trade and other receivable and short-term loans which represents
approx. 45% of the total assets in average. And decrease in overall equity
position of the company is observed which makes the company high leveraged.
Summary
When considering the Vertical Analysis for financial
statement analysis we can understand that the composition of the company’s
assets and its performance. As such, SCP has grown its business substantially
interms of sales. But the company finds difficulties in financing operating
cost even with substantial decrease in cost over the period as a percentage of
sales, due to low margins derived from their target market. SCP has to look
into more diversified markets with average high returns to sustain.
And it was observed that the company uses its assets
efficiently, thus it finances its expansion through debt financing and retained
earnings which is cautious to some extent. The company may become highly
leveraged and might increase its borrowing cost. Which will find difficulties
with the thin margins.
Ratio Analysis
Liquidity and Efficiency Ratios
Liquidity ratios measures the company’s ability to meets its
short-term debt, that is the relationship of the current assets and current
liability. From these ratios an investor can get an insight of the company’s
solvency level at an eventuality or during an economic shock.
Efficiency ratios measures the company’s efficiency of
resource allocation, basically working capital management of the company.
Inorder to be efficient an organization as to maintain its liquidity
position.
Current Ratio
Current ratio measures the that ability
of the company to meet its current liability with its current assets. This
measures the solvency level of the company.
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
Total Current Assets |
1,535,149,459
|
1,753,138,084
|
1,919,337,614
|
3,012,920,762
|
3,128,838,360
|
Total Current Liabilities |
1,121,357,421
|
1,109,465,426
|
1,124,424,096
|
2,087,087,905
|
2,486,349,632
|
|
1.4
|
1.6
|
1.7
|
1.4
|
1.3
|
Current Ratio: |
1.4 : 1
|
1.6 : 1
|
1.7 : 1
|
1.4 : 1
|
1.3 : 1
|
In general practice the company has to maintain a current
ratio of 2:1. But SCP has maintained an average current ratio of 1.5:1, that is
1.5 current liabilities to meet its current liabilities. If an organization
doesn’t maintain its current liability it could either be insolvent or might be
inefficient. In other words, if a company maintains a current asset ratio above
the required level, it loses the opportunity of generating more profits (less
efficient). Therefore, when considering the current ratio, it best to look into
the industry. Since SCP is in manufacturing industry with large part of raw
martials imported with higher credit period (180 days), a current ratio of
1.5:1 is acceptable. But in the year 2018 the company has maintained a current
ratio of 1.3:1 which is below the average. It because to increase in trade
creditors due to government projects.
Net working capital
Calculates the assets used in the day to
day operation of the business. Or in other words measures amount of working
capital financed by the company to with stand any external shock.
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
Total Current Assets |
1,535,149,459
|
1,753,138,084
|
1,919,337,614
|
3,012,920,762
|
3,128,838,360
|
Total Current Liabilities |
1,121,357,421
|
1,109,465,426
|
1,124,424,096
|
2,087,087,905
|
2,486,349,632
|
Net Working Capital |
413,792,038
|
643,672,658
|
794,913,518
|
925,832,857
|
642,488,728
|
Acid test Ratio (Quick ratio)
Acid test ratio also known as the quick ratio is a tool used
to access the immediate liquidity position of the company. This ratio is
calculated considering all the current assets and Current liability without
stocks. It is assumed that stocks in general has the least liquidity current
asset. Therefore, at the time of solvency it will take time for the company to
realize from stocks.
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
Total Current Assets |
1,535,149,459
|
1,753,138,084
|
1,919,337,614
|
3,012,920,762
|
3,128,838,360
|
Inventories |
564,953,048
|
557,877,848
|
653,626,097
|
1,160,345,333
|
893,039,653
|
Total Current Liabilities |
1,121,357,421
|
1,109,465,426
|
1,124,424,096
|
2,087,087,905
|
2,486,349,632
|
|
0.9
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
Quick Ratio: |
0.09 : 1
|
1.1 : 1
|
1.1 : 1
|
0.09 : 1
|
0.9 : 1
|
When considering the general practice, it is always
advisable to maintain 1:1 Quick ratio. That is one current asset for one
current liability excluding stocks. SCP has maintained optimum level of quick
ratio to meet any market schock.
Debtors turnover Period (Accounts Receivable Turnover)
Debtors turnover period is a tool to evaluate the company’s
efficiency and its credit policy. Lowe the account turnover ratio it is better
for the company. If the company has standards to grant and collect credit in a
small duration the company will experience a high debtors’ turnover ratio.
Which means that the company will have enough liquidity in its business
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
Net Sales |
2,137,572,003
|
3,276,059,072
|
2,865,490,013
|
3,724,981,774
|
3,839,979,820
|
Avg. Account Receivable |
675,984,099
|
854,643,402
|
989,396,913
|
1,149,285,047
|
1,466,927,303
|
Account Receivable Ratio (times) |
3.2
|
3.8
|
2.9
|
3.2
|
2.6
|
SCP has maintained its debtors very low debtor turnover
ratio. It is because SCP is targeting at construction industry and government
sector, where there is a high credit period in general.
Average Collection Period
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
"Account Receivable Ratio (times)" |
3.2
|
3.8
|
2.9
|
3.2
|
2.6
|
Accounts Receivable Turnover in Days |
115
|
95
|
126
|
113
|
139
|
No of Days |
115 days
|
95 days
|
126 days
|
113 days
|
139 days
|
This displays debtor turnover ratio as number of days for
better understanding. In average SCP provides 3-4 months of credit to its
clients.
Assets Turnover Ratio
Total asset turnover ratio
describes how firm efficiently using both long term and short term assets. We
can say that each rupee of your firm’s assets generating sale. High assets
turnover always preferable. High turnover asset means firm uses its assets efficiently.
This ratio gives creditor and investor idea for managing assets.
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
Net sales |
2,137,572,003
|
3,276,059,072
|
2,865,490,013
|
3,724,981,774
|
3,839,979,820
|
Avg. Total Assets |
2,872,000,554
|
2,812,716,352
|
2,962,702,338
|
3,526,537,995
|
4,310,699,833
|
Total Assets Turnover |
74.4%
|
116.47%
|
96.72%
|
105.63%
|
89.08%
|
SCP has maintained asset turnover ratio efficiently but the
ratio has reduced in 2014 and 2018 compared to other years. In 2018 the company
has expanded its assets which has resulted in a decrease in the ratio.
Inventory turnover
This ratio displays the number of times a
stock is sold per year. In other words number of full batches, a company
produces over a period of one year. The higher the ratio displays that the
company is more efficient interms of production.
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
Cost of Sales |
1,834,518,102
|
2,540,699,016
|
2,240,987,288
|
2,880,335,542
|
3,260,481,855
|
Avg. Invertor |
564,953,048
|
561,415,448
|
605,751,973
|
906,985,715
|
1,026,692,493
|
Inventory Turnover (times) |
3.2
|
4.5
|
3.7
|
3.2
|
3.2
|
SCP has maintained well above 3 times of inventory turnover
ratio. This displays that the company has sold the fresh product 3 times per
year.
Sales turnover period
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
Inventory Turnover (times) |
3.2
|
4.5
|
3.7
|
3.2
|
3.2
|
Inventory Turnover days 365/times |
155
|
81
|
99
|
115
|
115
|
No of Days |
114 days
|
81 days
|
99 days
|
115 days
|
115 days
|
In average number of days, the company takes to make a sale
is calculated as Sales turnover period. SCP in aver has taken nearly 3 months
for a sale. Since the company is catering to high end customers where the
purchase are made on bulk.
Profitability Ratios
Net Profit Margin
Calculates net profit as a percentage of
sales. In other words, percentage of sales that is added to the bottom line
profits of the company. It is utmost important for an organization to
understand the ratio since it may lead to operating loss.
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
Net Profit |
-270,066,205
|
303,776,315
|
175,921,562
|
239,671,384
|
-53,235,689
|
Net sales |
2,137,572,003
|
3,276,059,072
|
2,865,490,013
|
3,724,981,774
|
3,839,979,820
|
Net Profit Margin |
-12.63%
|
9.27%
|
6.14%
|
6.43%
|
-1.39%
|
SCP has experienced over all loss during 2014 and 2018 which
is displayed as the negative Net profit ratio. As per the industry the net
profit ratio of a cable manufacture is above to 10% (Kelaniya Cables – 12.3%).
SCP has to look into new avenues to restructure their products to generate
profitability
Gross Profit Margin
Gross profit ratio is an indicative ratio
which displays the relationship of gross profit and sales. In other words,
gross profit generated for each rupee of sales. Gross profit ratio can be
maintained with the costing strategy. The company could use mark up costing
strategy to maintain high gross profit margin.
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
Gross Profit |
303,053,901
|
735,360,056
|
624,502,725
|
844,646,232
|
579,497,965
|
Net sales |
2,137,572,003
|
3,276,059,072
|
2,865,490,013
|
3,724,981,774
|
3,839,979,820
|
Gross Profit Margin |
14.18%
|
22.45%
|
21.79%
|
22.68%
|
15.09%
|
SCP has maintained very narrow gross profit margin
throughout the years in consideration. The company had to look into more retail
business where it can keep high markups and thereby increase its profitability.
Gross profit margin is a critical factor the company has to address since it
has direct impact over the overall profitability of the business
Assets turnover
Assets turnover ratio denotes the contribution of total
assets for sales. In other words, displays the efficiency of the assets of the
company to generate sales.
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
Net sales |
2,137,572,003
|
3,276,059,072
|
2,865,490,013
|
3,724,981,774
|
3,839,979,820
|
Avg. Total Assets |
2,872,000,554
|
2,812,716,352
|
2,962,702,338
|
3,526,537,995
|
4,310,699,833
|
Total Assets Turnover |
74.4%
|
116.5%
|
96.7%
|
105.6%
|
89.1%
|
SCP has maintained high asset turnover ratio throughout the
five years with highest in 2015 and 2017 where the company has performed well.
In year 2018 the asset turnover ratio as decreased due to purchase on new PPE
to start a new plant, whereas that growth is still not reflected in the sales.
Therefore, with the increase in production in the future with the new plant
should be considered to compensate the increase in total assets.
Return on investment
Return on investment calculates the
contribution of the assets to generate profits for the company. The company
invest on its assets, therefore when calculation return on investment we
consider total assets compared to net profit of the organization. The higher
the ratio the efficient the organization is with its asset management and
profitability.
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
Net Profit |
-270,066,205
|
303,776,315
|
175,921,562
|
239,671,384
|
-53,235,689
|
Avg. Total Assets |
2,872,000,554
|
2,812,716,352
|
2,962,702,338
|
3,526,537,995
|
4,310,699,833
|
Return on Investment |
-9.4%
|
10.80%
|
5.94%
|
6.80%
|
-1.23%
|
SCP has experienced loss in both 2014 and 2018 leading to negative
ratio. But the company has been efficient in year 2015. In 2018 the company has
increased its assets by 22% and has made a loss, which has contributed to a
negative ratio.
Return on equity
Return on equity is one of the key
indicators that investors look into. It describes how efficient the
organization is interms of profitability in return to their investment. Or in other words shows how much profit each rupee of common
stockholders' equity generates. This is an important measurement for potential
investors because they want to see how efficiently a company will use their
money to generate net income. ROE is also an indicator of how effective
management is at using equity financing to fund operations and grow the
company.
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
Net Profit |
-270,066,205
|
303,776,315
|
175,921,562
|
239,671,384
|
-53,235,689
|
Stated Capital /Avg stcck |
894,565,898
|
894,565,898
|
894,565,898
|
894,565,898
|
894,565,898
|
Return on Equity |
-30.19
|
33.96%
|
19.67%
|
26.79%
|
-5.95%
|
SCP has made negative returns in 2014 and 2018 resulting
negative ratios. Other three years 2015,2016 and 2017 the company has generated
attractive returns. Since the company has not expanded its stated capital, the
trends in return has not made any significant impact (i.e. decrease in net
profit in 2017 has not made significance impact to the ratio.
Solvency Ratios
Debt to Asset Ratio
Debt to asset ratio calculates the total
liability in relation to total assets. At the time of an eventuality the
company’s ability to meet its debt is considered under this ratio.
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
Total Liabilities |
1,312,868,365
|
1,367,411,107
|
1,417,732,727
|
2,319,851,651
|
2,775,445,940
|
Total Assets |
2,722,014,568
|
2,903,418,135
|
3,021,986,540
|
4,031,089,450
|
4,590,310,215
|
Debt Ratio |
48.23%
|
47.10%
|
46.91%
|
57.55%
|
60.46%
|
SCP has maintained an average of 50% ratio, but in 2018 and
2017 the company has increased gradually. The lower the ratio it’s better for
the company.
Debt to Equity Ratio
This ratio compares total
debt against equity. The debt to equity ratio shows the percentage of company
financing that comes from creditors and investors. A higher debt to equity
ratio indicates that more creditor financing (loans) is used than investor
financing (shareholders).
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
Total Liabilities |
1,312,868,365
|
1,367,411,107
|
1,417,732,727
|
2,319,851,651
|
2,775,445,940
|
Total Equity |
1,409,146,203
|
1,536,007,028
|
1,604,253,813
|
1,711,237,799
|
1,814,864,272
|
Debt/Equity Ratio |
93.17%
|
89.02%
|
88.37%
|
135.57%
|
152.93%
|
SCP has maintained the below 100% for three year ending
2014, 2015 and 2016 but in 2017 and 2018 the company has exceeded its equity
position. The sign of having liability exceeding its equity displays that the
company is highly leveraged. The company has financed its business mostly from
external funds rather than shareholders funds.
Times Interest Earned
Times interest earned calculates company’s
operating profit in times with its interest expense. Or in other words the
number of times profits covers its interest expense.
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
EBIT
|
(216,359,272)
|
492,179,664
|
341,842,597
|
445,081,375
|
118,640,857
|
Interest expense
|
137,248,148
|
90,366,488
|
86,557,006
|
123,600,270
|
154,366,889
|
Interest cover Times
|
(2)
|
5
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
SCP has covered its interest expense for
the years under consideration except for 2014. In year 2018 the company has
made a net loss after interest and tax due to low interest cover ratio.
Plant Assets to Long term liabilities
Fixed assets ratio show how
much fixed assets are available against to equity. But one thing we need to keep
in mind total equity not invested in fixed assets means that part of equity
also invested in working capital.
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
|
Property, Plant & Equipment |
890,561,492
|
883,363,592
|
868,763,794
|
818,344,603
|
1,060,155,597
|
Total Equity |
1,409,146,203
|
1,536,007,028
|
1,604,253,813
|
1,711,237,799
|
1,814,864,272
|
Fixed Assets Ratio |
63.20%
|
57.51%
|
54.15%
|
47.82%
|
58.42%
|
It is visible that the company has its equity marginally
between PPE and working capital.
Market Ratios
Earnings per share
Earnings per share same as
any profitability or market prospect measurement ratio. High earning per share
always prefer then lower earnings per share because high ratio means firm high
profitability or amount available to distribute to its shareholders. High
earning per share often make the price rise.
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
EPS
|
-0.54
|
0.49
|
0.36
|
0.50
|
-0.05
|
SCP has issued 537.5Mn shares. The company has made very
narrow EPS due to low profitability.
Book value per share
This calculates the actual value of a share or ownership of
the company interms of the equity.
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
Shares holders equity
|
1,409,146,203
|
1,536,007,028
|
1,604,253,813
|
1,711,237,799
|
1,814,864,272
|
No. of shares
|
537,512,430
|
537,512,430
|
537,512,430
|
537,512,430
|
537,512,430
|
Book Value per share
|
2.62
|
2.86
|
2.98
|
3.18
|
3.38
|
Price earning per share
Price earnings ratio describe
that the investor is willing to pay firm share based on its current earnings.
Investor used this ratio for evaluation stock market value should be
predicating future earnings per share. Higher future earning usually expecting
to issue on higher dividend giving by firm. This ratio help investor to how
much pay for the stock at the current price earning. Low price ratio means
company has low future growth.
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
Price earning per share
|
-3.14
|
8.19
|
8.16
|
6.23
|
-43.10
|
Summary
When analyzing the financial statement of Sierra Cables PLC
(SCP) it was visible that the company has done exceptional well other than the
below mentioned areas.
·
The company is maintaining very thin gross
profit margins, due to its customer cluster. This narrow margin has been proven
with lower gross profit ratio.
·
The company has expanded it business purely
through debt financing. That is the company as increased in assets (e.g. stocks
, debtors and PPE) through debt financing rather than equity financing. This
will result the company an increase in interest cost and thereby impacting on
the bottom line profits.
Over all considering the facts of increasing in working
capital with relatively low increase in sales, the company may be in a position
of overtrading. Where the company increases its working capital without any
significance increase in sales or revenue to the company. And these expansions
are taken place with debt financing, where inturn the company has to bear
interest expense. Which is not possible with thin margins.