An
Analysis of Cyberbullying Sensitivity Levels of University Students of Sri
Lanka
1.1 Background
of the study
With the development of technology the
means of communication have changed rapidly in the past few years. Today the internet
and social media are frequently used to stay connected with people rather than
face-to-face relationships. More than the adults the youth are attached
to cyber communication as an integral part of their daily life. For the youth online communication
has assisted to expand their social circle. Therefore youth are actively using
the internet as a very convenient and important form of social interaction.
In Sri Lanka the access of young people
to the internet have rapidly increased in recent years. Total internet
connections grew by 68.4 percent during 2014 largely due to the growth of
mobile internet usage. In 2013 internet connections grew by 47 percent, increasing
internet penetration (connections per 100 persons) to 9.8 percent.
In
the case of Sri Lanka social media has grown at an alarming rate. There are over
2.3 million users of social media from the total population of 21 million. That means 11.5 percent of the Sri Lankan
population use Facebook. When a gender breakup is considered around 1.4 million are males and the rest would be
female. It is estimated that on
average they spend about 34 minutes a day on social media and the age group of 25-34 makes up 33 percent of the
entire base.
While such developments have provided great
opportunities it also brings new problems related to
social and individual development of
young people. One of those main problems is cyberbullying, which is expressed
as purposeful and repeated misuse of technology to scare and harm others. In
the Sri Lankan context the rate of cybercrimes have increased rapidly according to the Computer Emergency Response Team. There were 900 incidents related to cyber
offences reported from January till end of May, while in 2014 there were 2250
reported incidents of that nature. In 2012 and 2013 the reported incidents were
1100 and 1200 respectively. Based on the given statistics the number of
offences have almost doubled from 2013 to 2014.
While most of the studies in the literature
focuses on the influences of cyberbullying on victimhood, cyberbullying sensitivity
of people is mostly ignored. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate
cyberbullying sensitivity levels of
university students, who are among the potential victims of cyberbullying and whether
this could be used to predict cyberbullying sensitivity.
1.2 Objectives
of the study
1. To identify the existing levels of cyberbullying
sensitivity among university students
2.
To find out the relationship between
cyberbullying sensitivity levels among university students and their perceived
social support levels
3. To find out cyberbullying sensitivity levels
of students and their perceived social support according to gender
1.3 Scope of the
study and limitations
This
research looks at cyberbullying sensitivity of government university students
which is a representative sample from the educated young crowd. Responses from
students of university of Sri Jayawardenepura, Colombo, Moratuwa and Kelaniya
were gathered for this purpose.
This study has some limitations. First occurrences
of cyberbullying were understood from a subjective perspective. In other words
concept of cyberbullying will differ from individual to individual and hence
this study does not provide an objective interpretation to the notion of
cyberbullying. No in depth information was gathered regarding responses to
certain specific instances of cyberbullying. It is better to
utilize qualitative data collection
techniques such as interview and observation, which will reveal perceptions to
cyberbullying events in a more holistic
way.
Secondly, for the current study, the
factors predicting cyberbullying sensitivity are
limited to social support. There are
other variables that must be taken to consideration.
Finally, the social support perceived
by the young people may be affected by their current relationship with other people
than their parents, teachers and friends which is ignored in the current research.
No comments:
Post a Comment