1. INTRODUCTION
The main objective of this assignment is analysis of Financial Statement
of Selected Quoted Public Company in Colombo Stock Exchange. For this purpose I
have selected Financial Statements of Diesel and Motor Engineering PLC (DIMO)
for the last 5 years (From 2018/19 to 2021/22). In this assignment, it has been
used main Financial Statements to analyze the Financial Performance of the
Company such as Profit or Loss Statement, Other Comprehensive Income Statement,
Statement of Financial Statement, Statement of Changes in Equity and Cash Flow
Statement.
In addition to the above, it has been used Investor Related Information
of the Company for this analysis. Analysis of the Financial Statement of Diesel
and Motor Engineering PLC has been basically conducted under three main
techniques of Horizontal Analysis, Vertical Analysis and Ratio Analysis.
Finally it has been made Altman’s Z –Score Model to measure the Financial
Stability of the Company.
It is assumed that this assignment provides detailed analysis and
interpretation of Financial Statements of the Diesel and Motor Engineering PLC
under above three main techniques.
2. BACKGROUND OF THE COMPANY
Diesel & Motor Engineering PLC (DIMO) was founded in 1939 by four
young entrepreneurs. Tata Motors’ relationship with DIMO began in 1961
when the very first Tata Motors truck was exported to them in 1961. DIMO
became a Publicly Quoted Company in 1964, by obtaining a listing with the
Colombo Brokers’ Association. In 1970, DIMO began producing radiators, brake
linings, gaskets and kingpins which were very rare, due to the import
restrictions in place at the time.
The dawn of the '90s witnessed the launch of the DIMO Automobile Training
School (DATS) established in collaboration with Daimler AG, Germany, to develop
a programme of international standards. The school became the first in the
private sector to offer training in automotive technology as a social service.
In 2017, DIMO enters Myanmar to establish its first offshore subsidiary
by investing in DIMO Lanka Company Limited. In 2018 DIMO expands its footprint
in agriculture by acquiring equity interest in Plant Chemistry (Private)
Limited and Plant Seed (Private) Limited - the first acquisitions of the Group.
Presently, DIMO offers customers excellent and unmatched after-sales service,
along with a variety of mobility and logistics solutions.
Today DIMO is a global company, one that has always reflected the
enduring spirit of Sri Lanka on its over eight decades of journey to success.
The company is now focused on transforming its business and processes with digitalization
and is reimagining its product portfolio with a brand new strategic focus to
successfully navigate through future challenges.
3. OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ANALYSIS
Financial
statement analysis evaluates financial information presented in financial
statements to make better decisions about the business. The Profit or Loss
Statement, Statement of Financial Position, Statement of Comprehensive Income,
Statement of Changes in Equity, Cash Flow statement among other financial
information, can be analyzed. The information obtained from financial
statements analysis is benefited for decision-making for internal and external
stakeholders and can give a company valuable information on overall performance
and specific areas for improvement. The analysis can help them with budgeting,
cost reduction decision, growth in revenues, and future capital investments
opportunities. Further, it provides lending institutions with an unbiased view
of a Company’s Financial Stability.
When considering
the outcomes from analysis, it is important for a company to understand that
data produced needs to be compared to others within industry and close
competitors. The company should also consider their past experience and how it
corresponds to current and future performance expectations. Three common
analysis tools are used for decision-making; horizontal analysis, vertical
analysis, and ratio analysis.
Horizontal
analysis looks comparison of Company’s financial performance across time. A
company will look at one period (usually a year) and compare it to another
period. The trend analysis is also part of the Horizontal Analysis. Vertical
analysis shows a comparison of a line item within a statement to another line
item within that same statement. It analyses vertical effect of the line items
compared with the other parts of the business. Ratio analysis uses to identify
statistical relationship among Financial Statement Items and important ratio
metrics.
In
this assignment it has been described detailed analysis of Financial Statement
of DIMO under three main tools of horizontal analysis, vertical analysis and
ratio analysis.
4. HORIZONTAL ANALYSIS
Horizontal analysis
is an approach used to analyze
financial statements by comparing specific financial information for a certain
accounting period with information from base period. Analysts use such
an approach to analyze historical trends.
Horizontal Analysis –
Statement of Profit or Loss
Base Year = 2016/17
|
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
|||||
|
Value Change (Rs. Mn) |
% Change |
Value Change (Rs. Mn) |
% Change |
Value Change (Rs. Mn) |
% Change |
Value Change (Rs. Mn) |
% Change |
Value Change (Rs. Mn) |
% Change |
Revenue |
(880.5) |
-2.1 |
(7,170.7) |
-17.7 |
(4,849.1) |
-14.5 |
(3,534.1) |
-12.4 |
5,132.5 |
20.6 |
Cost of Sales |
(525.0) |
-1.5 |
(6,806.2) |
-19.9 |
(4,999.3) |
-18.2 |
(3,437.7) |
-15.3 |
2,707.6 |
14.2 |
Gross Profit |
(355.5) |
-5.4 |
(364.6) |
-5.9 |
150.3 |
2.6 |
(96.4) |
-1.6 |
2,425.0 |
41.0 |
Other Operating Income |
(118.6) |
-44.0 |
23.6 |
15.6 |
85.4 |
48.9 |
22.7 |
8.7 |
223.6 |
79.1 |
Selling and Distribution Expenses |
(65.0) |
-6.9 |
(271.6) |
-31.0 |
(13.4) |
-2.2 |
35.0 |
5.9 |
(107.5) |
-17.2 |
Impairment Loss / (reversals) |
(87.5) |
100.0 |
272.8 |
-311.7 |
59.7 |
32.2 |
(89.7) |
-36.6 |
(115.0) |
-74.0 |
Administration Expenses |
(101.1) |
-2.3 |
(50.6) |
-1.2 |
(130.7) |
-3.1 |
170.0 |
4.2 |
1,043.5 |
24.6 |
Operating Profit |
(220.4) |
-14.2 |
(291.6) |
-21.8 |
320.1 |
30.7 |
(189.0) |
-13.9 |
1,827.6 |
155.5 |
Finance Income |
(47.1) |
-23.7 |
(2.0) |
-1.3 |
52.1 |
34.9 |
(145.4) |
-72.2 |
(12.8) |
-22.8 |
Finance Cost |
190.2 |
22.4 |
417.2 |
40.2 |
(210.6) |
-14.5 |
(635.7) |
-51.1 |
1,694.3 |
278.0 |
Net Finance Cost |
237.4 |
36.5 |
419.3 |
47.2 |
(262.7) |
-20.1 |
(490.3) |
-47.0 |
1,707.1 |
308.4 |
Profit before Tax / Loss |
(457.8) |
-50.5 |
(710.9) |
-158.4 |
582.8 |
222.3 |
301.3 |
94.0 |
120.6 |
19.4 |
Income Tax Expenses /(Reversals) |
(189.6) |
-60.5 |
(172.6) |
-139.5 |
101.8 |
208.1 |
121.0 |
228.8 |
(14.4) |
-8.3 |
Profit / Loss for the Year |
(268.1) |
-45.2 |
(538.2) |
-165.7 |
481.0 |
225.5 |
180.3 |
67.4 |
134.9 |
30.1 |
Revenue of
the DIMO significantly decreased throughout the first 4 years and there is a
20.6% growth (Rs. 5,132.5 Mn) in Financial Year 2021/22 compare to the prior
year. Cost of Sales and Gross profit are also decreased during the first 4
years and for the year 2021/22, it has been significantly increased by 14.2%
and 41.0% respectively.
Other
Operating Income has significantly improved during the year 2021/22 and it is
continuously increased except the year 2017/18. Company has able to reduce the
Selling and Distribution Expense throughout the analysis period except the year
2020/21. Compared with the other Financial Years, Administration Expenses has
increased significantly during 2021/22. Profit before tax and Profit after tax has
declined during the first 2 years and there is a drastic improvement in last 3
years.
Horizontal Analysis –
Statement of Financial Position
Base Year = 2016/17
|
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
|||||
|
Value Change (Rs. Mn) |
% Change |
Value Change (Rs. Mn) |
% Change |
Value Change (Rs. Mn) |
% Change |
Value Change (Rs. Mn) |
% Change |
Value Change (Rs. Mn) |
% Change |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipments |
2,828.2 |
34.0 |
20.0 |
0.2 |
373.5 |
3.3 |
2,297.2 |
19.9 |
357.3 |
2.6 |
Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
(6.8) |
-28.4 |
0.4 |
2.1 |
(6.5) |
-36.9 |
9.7 |
87.1 |
174.0 |
837.9 |
Investment in Subsidiaries |
450.9 |
1936.2 |
40.4 |
8.5 |
50.2 |
9.8 |
(31.9) |
-5.7 |
195.5 |
36.7 |
Investment in Equity Securities |
55.6 |
712.0 |
(16.1) |
-25.5 |
(14.2) |
-30.1 |
(22.2) |
-67.2 |
41.6 |
384.0 |
Total Non Current Assets |
3,327.8 |
39.7 |
44.6 |
0.4 |
403.0 |
3.4 |
2,252.7 |
18.5 |
768.2 |
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
341.4 |
4.0 |
(1,640.3) |
-18.4 |
(397.2) |
-5.5 |
(2,491.8) |
-36.2 |
3,142.7 |
71.6 |
Trade and Other Receivables |
1,244.1 |
37.4 |
401.2 |
8.8 |
656.9 |
13.2 |
673.0 |
12.0 |
1,717.5 |
27.3 |
Other Current Assets |
(211.0) |
-25.6 |
797.0 |
129.9 |
433.7 |
30.7 |
(727.7) |
-39.5 |
32.8 |
2.9 |
Current Tax Liabilities |
118.5 |
100.0 |
175.1 |
147.7 |
(57.3) |
-19.5 |
(236.3) |
-100.0 |
- |
- |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
(78.0) |
-28.9 |
(72.4) |
-37.8 |
451.4 |
379.0 |
278.3 |
48.8 |
1,488.8 |
175.4 |
Total Current Assets |
1,415.1 |
10.9 |
(339.4) |
-2.4 |
1,087.4 |
7.7 |
(2,504.5) |
-16.5 |
6,381.8 |
50.4 |
Total Assets |
4,742.9 |
22.2 |
(294.9) |
-1.1 |
1,490.4 |
5.8 |
(251.7) |
-0.9 |
7,150.0 |
26.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity and Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated Capital |
- |
0.0 |
- |
0.0 |
- |
0.0 |
- |
0.0 |
195.3 |
45.9 |
Reserves |
1,376.1 |
15.6 |
(254.2) |
-2.5 |
300.5 |
3.0 |
2,502.0 |
24.4 |
315.9 |
2.5 |
Total Equity |
1,376.1 |
14.9 |
(254.2) |
-2.4 |
300.5 |
2.9 |
2,502.0 |
23.4 |
511.2 |
3.9 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Long Term Liabilities |
(280.0) |
-47.4 |
180.0 |
58.1 |
(200.2) |
-40.8 |
789.0 |
272.1 |
85.1 |
7.9 |
Lease Liabilities |
- |
- |
- |
- |
395.9 |
- |
(74.9) |
(18.91) |
184.8 |
57.58 |
Employee Benefits |
25.3 |
4.3 |
77.7 |
12.7 |
18.5 |
2.7 |
10.5 |
1.5 |
66.1 |
9.2 |
Deferred Tax Liabilities |
1,613.7 |
651.7 |
(52.0) |
-2.8 |
(131.9) |
-7.3 |
216.5 |
12.9 |
(476.1) |
-25.1 |
Contract Liabilities |
14.1 |
160.5 |
6.8 |
29.7 |
24.9 |
84.2 |
(1.6) |
-2.9 |
(30.2) |
-57.2 |
Total Non Current Liabilities |
1,373.1 |
96.0 |
212.5 |
7.6 |
107.2 |
3.6 |
939.6 |
30.1 |
(170.3) |
-4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Payables |
1,236.5 |
70.3 |
(1,321.9) |
-44.1 |
540.4 |
32.3 |
2,039.5 |
92.1 |
3,040.6 |
71.5 |
Other Current Liabilities |
757.1 |
8.5 |
1,068.8 |
11.0 |
542.3 |
5.0 |
(5,732.8) |
-50.7 |
3,768.6 |
67.7 |
Total Current Liabilities |
1,993.7 |
18.6 |
(253.1) |
-2.0 |
1,082.7 |
8.7 |
(3,693.3) |
-27.3 |
6,809.2 |
69.3 |
Total Liabilities |
3,366.8 |
27.8 |
(40.6) |
-0.3 |
1,189.9 |
7.7 |
(2,753.7) |
-16.6 |
6,638.8 |
47.8 |
Total Equity and Liabilities |
4,742.9 |
22.2 |
(294.9) |
-1.1 |
1,490.4 |
5.8 |
(251.7) |
-0.9 |
7,150.0 |
26.4 |
The
Property, Plant & Equipment value has increased approximately 3.0%
throughout the analysis period except financial year 2017/18. Investment in
Equity Securities has suddenly improved during the Year 2021/22 and remaining
Financial Years it has negative growth. Total Current Assets are fluctuated
throughout the analysis period and highest growth percentage (50.4%) reflected
during the year 2021/22 and lowest growth (-16.5%) reported at F/Y 2020/21. There
was average growth in Total Non-Current Assets and decline has been reported in
F/Y 2021/22.
Capital
Infusion has been made during the year 2020/21 and there was no growth in
remaining financial years. Total Assets of the Company has declined
significantly and there was 26.4 % sudden growth in last financial year. Total
non-current Assets also increased at initial financial years and there was a
negative growth in 2021/22. Total Current Liabilities are also continuously
decreased except the last Financial Year.
Total Liabilities also fluctuated throughout the analysis period and
highest growth reported in F/Y 2021/22, it was 47.8% compared to the base year.
5. TREND ANALYSIS
Trend analysis of financial statements helps information users
to get understand of percentage changes over the selected base period
performance. Trend Analysis of the DIMO
Financials during last 5 Years as follow.
Trend Analysis – Statement of
Profit or Loss (Base Year 2017/18)
%
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
|
Revenue |
100.0 |
82.3 |
70.3 |
61.6 |
74.3 |
Cost of Sales |
100.0 |
80.1 |
65.6 |
55.5 |
63.4 |
Gross Profit |
100.0 |
94.1 |
96.6 |
95.0 |
133.9 |
Other Operating Income |
100.0 |
115.6 |
172.2 |
187.2 |
335.2 |
Selling and Distribution Expenses |
100.0 |
69.0 |
67.5 |
71.5 |
59.2 |
Impairment Loss / (reversals) |
100.0 |
(211.7) |
(279.9) |
(177.5) |
(46.1) |
Administration Expenses |
100.0 |
98.8 |
95.7 |
99.7 |
124.2 |
Operating Profit |
100.0 |
78.2 |
102.1 |
88.0 |
224.8 |
Finance Income |
100.0 |
98.7 |
133.1 |
37.0 |
28.6 |
Finance Cost |
100.0 |
140.2 |
119.9 |
58.7 |
221.8 |
Net Finance Cost |
100.0 |
147.2 |
117.6 |
62.4 |
254.8 |
Profit before Tax / Loss |
100.0 |
(58.4) |
71.5 |
138.6 |
165.5 |
Income Tax Expenses /(Reversals) |
100.0 |
(39.5) |
42.7 |
140.5 |
128.9 |
Profit / Loss for the Year |
100.0 |
(65.7) |
82.4 |
137.9 |
179.4 |
According to the
above analysis Total Revenue of the Company has been declined in a significant
percentage with compared to the year 2017/18. Cost of Sales and Gross Profit
(except year 2021/22) also declined with compared to the base year of 2017/18.
It was recorded significant improvement in Gross Profit during the year 2021/22
compared with base year and other financial years. Further, Operating Profit
and Profit before Tax also decreased during the first 3 Financial Years
(2018/19, 2019/20 and 2020/21) compare to the base year. It was recorded
increasing trend in PBT and PAT for the last 2 Financial Years (2020/21 and
2021/22). Graphical trend analysis of Total Revenue, Gross Profit and Net
Profit of the Company can be illustrated as follow.
Trend Analysis – Statement of Financial Position
%
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipments |
100.0 |
100.2 |
103.5 |
124.1 |
127.3 |
Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
100.0 |
102.1 |
64.4 |
120.5 |
1,130.4 |
Investment in Subsidiaries |
100.0 |
108.5 |
119.1 |
112.4 |
153.6 |
Investment in Equity Securities |
100.0 |
74.5 |
52.1 |
17.1 |
82.7 |
Total Non Current Assets |
100.0 |
100.4 |
103.8 |
123.1 |
129.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
100.0 |
81.6 |
77.1 |
49.2 |
84.4 |
Trade and Other Receivables |
100.0 |
108.8 |
123.2 |
137.9 |
175.5 |
Other Current Assets |
100.0 |
229.9 |
300.6 |
182.0 |
187.3 |
Current Tax Liabilities |
100.0 |
247.7 |
199.4 |
- |
- |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
100.0 |
62.2 |
297.9 |
443.2 |
1,220.5 |
Total Current Assets |
100.0 |
97.6 |
105.2 |
87.8 |
132.1 |
Total Assets |
100.0 |
98.9 |
104.6 |
103.6 |
131.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity and Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
Stated Capital |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
145.9 |
Reserves |
100.0 |
97.5 |
100.5 |
125.0 |
128.1 |
Total Equity |
100.0 |
97.6 |
100.4 |
124.0 |
128.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Liabilities |
100.0 |
158.1 |
93.5 |
347.9 |
375.4 |
Lease Liabilities |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Employee Benefits |
100.0 |
112.7 |
115.8 |
117.5 |
128.3 |
Deferred Tax Liabilities |
100.0 |
97.2 |
90.1 |
101.8 |
76.2 |
Contract Liabilities |
100.0 |
129.7 |
238.8 |
231.9 |
99.3 |
Total Non Current Liabilities |
100.0 |
107.6 |
111.4 |
144.9 |
138.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Payables |
100.0 |
55.9 |
73.9 |
142.0 |
243.5 |
Other Current Liabilities |
100.0 |
111.0 |
116.6 |
57.5 |
96.4 |
Total Current Liabilities |
100.0 |
98.0 |
106.5 |
77.4 |
131.1 |
Total Liabilities |
100.0 |
99.7 |
107.4 |
89.6 |
132.5 |
Total Equity and Liabilities |
100.0 |
98.9 |
104.6 |
103.6 |
131.0 |
With compared to
the base year (2017/18), Total Non-Current Assets have been gradually increased
during last 5 years. Total Current Assets also increased during the 2019/20 and
2021/22. But there was a significant decline in Current Assets end of the Year
2020/21. Except Financial Year 2018/19, Total Assets of the Company have continuously
increased during the last 3 years.
There was rapid
improvement in Total Equity of the Company compared with base year. Total
Non-Current Liabilities also continuously increased during last 5 years. Compared
to the drop in Current Assets, there was a drop in Current Liabilities during
the 2 Financial Years of 2018/19 and 2020/21. Except these 2 Financial Years,
all other Financial Years it was reported significant increase in Current
Liabilities of the Company. Graphical Presentation of the Trend Analysis of the
DIMO is as follow:
6. VERTICAL
ANALYSIS
Vertical analysis is a method of analyzing each line item of the financial
statements as a percentage of a base amount. The base value item always shows at
100%, with each following line item representing a percentage of the whole.
Vertical Analysis of the Last 5 Years Financial Statements are as follows.
Vertical
Analysis – Statement of Profit or Loss
|
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
Revenue |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Cost of Sales |
84.6% |
82.4% |
78.9% |
76.3% |
72.3% |
Gross Profit |
15.4% |
17.6% |
21.1% |
23.7% |
27.7% |
Other Operating Income |
0.4% |
0.5% |
0.9% |
1.1% |
1.7% |
Selling and Distribution Expenses |
2.2% |
1.8% |
2.1% |
2.5% |
1.7% |
Impairment Loss / (reversals) |
-0.2% |
0.6% |
0.9% |
0.6% |
0.1% |
Administration Expenses |
10.5% |
12.6% |
14.3% |
17.0% |
17.6% |
Operating Profit |
3.3% |
3.1% |
4.8% |
4.7% |
10.0% |
Finance Income |
0.4% |
0.4% |
0.7% |
0.2% |
0.1% |
Finance Cost |
2.6% |
4.4% |
4.4% |
2.4% |
7.7% |
Net Finance Cost |
2.2% |
3.9% |
3.7% |
2.2% |
7.5% |
Profit before Tax / Loss |
1.1% |
-0.8% |
1.1% |
2.5% |
2.5% |
Income Tax Expenses /(Reversals) |
0.3% |
-0.1% |
0.2% |
0.7% |
0.5% |
Profit / Loss for the Year |
0.8% |
-0.6% |
0.9% |
1.8% |
1.9% |
For the analysis of Statement of Profit or Loss, it has been used Total
Revenue as base amount and every other items have been defined as a proportion
of Total Revenue. Cost of Sales has been taken largest portion of the Revenue
and there was a gradual decline in cost of sales during last 5 years. This was
mainly affected to the improvement of Gross Profit of DIMO. Further there was
significant percentage increase in PBT and PAT during last 2 years.
Vertical
Analysis – Statement of Financial Position
Assets |
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
Property, Plant and Equipments |
42.7% |
43.3% |
42.3% |
51.2% |
41.5% |
Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
0.1% |
0.1% |
0.0% |
0.1% |
0.6% |
Investment in Subsidiaries |
1.8% |
2.0% |
2.1% |
2.0% |
2.1% |
Investment in Equity Securities |
0.2% |
0.2% |
0.1% |
0.0% |
0.2% |
Total Non Current Assets |
44.8% |
45.5% |
44.5% |
53.2% |
44.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
34.1% |
28.2% |
25.2% |
16.2% |
22.0% |
Trade and Other Receivables |
17.5% |
19.2% |
20.6% |
23.3% |
23.4% |
Other Current Assets |
2.3% |
5.5% |
6.8% |
4.1% |
3.4% |
Current Tax Liabilities |
0.5% |
1.1% |
0.9% |
- |
- |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
0.7% |
0.5% |
2.1% |
3.1% |
6.8% |
Total Current Assets |
55.2% |
54.5% |
55.5% |
46.8% |
55.6% |
Total Assets |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity and Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
Stated Capital |
1.6% |
1.6% |
1.6% |
1.6% |
1.8% |
Reserves |
39.1% |
38.5% |
37.5% |
47.1% |
38.2% |
Total Equity |
40.7% |
40.2% |
39.1% |
48.7% |
40.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Liabilities |
1.2% |
1.9% |
1.1% |
4.0% |
3.4% |
Lease Liabilities |
- |
- |
1.4% |
1.2% |
1.5% |
Employee Benefits |
2.3% |
2.7% |
2.6% |
2.6% |
2.3% |
Deferred Tax Liabilities |
7.1% |
7.0% |
6.1% |
7.0% |
4.1% |
Contract Liabilities |
0.1% |
0.1% |
0.2% |
0.2% |
0.1% |
Total Non Current Liabilities |
10.7% |
11.7% |
11.4% |
15.0% |
11.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Payables |
11.5% |
6.5% |
8.1% |
15.7% |
21.3% |
Other Current Liabilities |
37.1% |
41.7% |
41.4% |
20.6% |
27.3% |
Total Current Liabilities |
48.6% |
48.2% |
49.5% |
36.3% |
48.6% |
Total Liabilities |
59.3% |
59.8% |
60.9% |
51.3% |
60.0% |
Total Equity and Liabilities |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
In the Statement of Financial Position, every line item under Assets is
defined as a proportion of Total Assets and every items under Equity and
Liabilities is presented as a proportion of Total Equity and Liabilities.
Total Non-Current Assets of the Company are not exceeded 50% of total
assets except the Financial Year 2020/21. Significant of Non-Current Assets (over
90%) represents Property, Plant & Equipment. Total Current Assets
represents over 50% of Total Assets (except Financial Year 2020/21) throughout
the last 5 years. Inventory percentage denominated below 25% for the last 2
years and Trade Receivables percentage has been improved over 20% during last 2
years.
Total Equity represents above 40% throughout the 5 years period and there
was slight decrease in reserves for the year 2019/20. Total Non-Current
Liabilities do not show significant movement during last 5 years but there is a
sudden flop in Financial Year 2020/21. Total Current Liabilities of the Company
also don’t show significant movement. But end of the Financial Year 2020/21,
there was sudden decrease in Current Liabilities.
7. RATIO ANALYSIS
Ratio analysis is a main Financial Statements analysis tool that can be
used to measure Liquidity, Operation Efficiency, Profitability, Solvency and
proper utilization of Assets by studying Financial Statements of the Company.
In this analysis, it has been used below major Ratio Categories:
i.
Liquidity and Efficiency
ii.
Solvency
iii.
Profitability
iv.
Market
There
are number of ratios under each category which support the stakeholders’ decision
making purpose and it has used following ratios to analysis the DIMO Financial
Statements during last 5 years.
i.
Liquidity and
Efficiency Ratios
Ratio |
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
Current Ratio |
1.14 |
1.13 |
1.12 |
1.29 |
1.14 |
Acid Test Ratio |
0.43 |
0.55 |
0.61 |
0.84 |
0.69 |
Accounts Receivable Turnover (times) |
10.27 |
6.99 |
5.38 |
4.19 |
4.20 |
Merchandise Turnover (times) |
3.92 |
3.39 |
3.18 |
3.38 |
3.65 |
Days' Sales Uncollected (No. of Days) |
41.2 |
54.4 |
72.1 |
92.1 |
97.2 |
Days' Sales in Inventory (No. of Days) |
94.9 |
96.7 |
111.7 |
84.1 |
126.4 |
Total Assets Turnover (times) |
1.71 |
1.28 |
1.07 |
0.92 |
0.98 |
Current Ratio - The current ratio is used
to calculate a company’s ability to meet its short-term debt and obligations
and it is also known as working capital ratio. The Current Ratio of the DIMO reported greater
than 1.0 and it represents a sign that company has sufficient ability to meet
its short term liabilities.
Acid Test Ratio –This Ratio measures the
Company’s ability to pay its current Liabilities using Quick Assets.
Inventories and pre-paid expenses are not considered as Quick Assets. Acid Test
Ratio of the Company takes average rate and it will be sufficient to meet short
term obligation. In the Year 2020/21, DIMO has reported 0.84 Acid Test Ratio
and Company’s Acid Test Ratio was decreased to 0.69 at the end of the year
2021/22.
Account Receivable Turnover – This Ratio
is used to measure how many times, the Company converts its receivables into
cash. The Higher value of Account Receivable Turnover Ratio represents company
efficiency in debt management. DIMO’s Account Receivable Turnover has decreased
throughout the past 5 years and it is not representing healthy debt management.
Merchandise Turnover – This Ratio measures the number of times
inventory is sold and replaced during the year. DIMO’s Merchandise Turnover is
close to 4.0 times and it is indicate ability in selling goods of the Company.
Company has maintained average level of Merchandise Turnover throughout the
last 5 years.
Day’s Sales Uncollected –This measures the liquidity of
receivables. As per the Financial Statements of DIMO, No. of Days Sales
Uncollected has continuously increased and it is close to 100 days end of the
year 2021/22. This is not better for the Company’s Liquidity Position.
Day’s Sales in Inventory – This Ratio measures the liquidity of
inventory and average time in days that the Company takes turn its inventory
into cash. As per the DIMO’s Financial
Statement this Ratio has been continuously increased and it was 126 Days end of
the year 2021/22. This is not a good sign for the Company and maintain below
100 days should be most important.
Total Assets Turnover – Efficiency of the Assets in terms of
producing sales is mainly measured by using this Ratio. The Value should be
greater than 1 to indicate sufficient efficiency of the Company. Assets
Turnover of the DIMO is close to 1.0 throughout the past 5 years. But this
ratio has gradually decrease with compare to the year 2017/18.
ii.
Solvency Ratios
Ratio |
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
Debt Ratio |
59.3% |
59.8% |
60.9% |
51.3% |
60.0% |
Equity Ratio |
40.7% |
40.2% |
39.1% |
48.7% |
40.0% |
Times Interest Earned (times) |
1.43 |
0.82 |
1.26 |
2.02 |
1.32 |
Debt Ratio - Debt ratio measures
the financial stability of the company and it represents what portion of a company’s
assets is contributed by creditors. The Debt Ratio of DIMO is approximately 60.0% and it means
that company is mainly depended on debt financing. The higher Debt Ratio
contributes to high insolvent risk and
excessive debt can lead to a
heavy debt repayment
burden.
Equity Ratio – Equity Ratio measures
the proportion of an owner's investment used to finance the company's assets.
The Equity Ratio of DIMO is approximately 40% throughout the last 5 years. For
the year 2020/21, this ratio has increased to 48.7%.
Times Interest Earned (times) – This
ratio measures the company’s ability to pay interest based on Profit before
Interest and Taxes. The large value represents the more ability of paying interest
on debt. Times interest earned of the DIMO takes low value and it shows high
volume of finance cost compared with Profit before Interest and Taxes.
iii.
Profitability Ratios
Ratio |
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
Net Profit Margin |
0.8% |
-0.6% |
0.9% |
1.8% |
1.9% |
Gross Profit Margin |
15.4% |
17.6% |
21.1% |
23.7% |
27.7% |
Return on Total Assets |
1.4% |
-0.8% |
1.0% |
1.6% |
1.9% |
Return on Common Shareholders' Equity |
3.3% |
-2.0% |
2.5% |
3.8% |
4.3% |
Book Value per Common Share (Rs.) |
1,196.78 |
1,168.14 |
1,201.99 |
1,426.79 |
1,482.17 |
Basic Earnings per Shares (Rs.) |
36.60 |
-24.03 |
30.16 |
48.54 |
63.15 |
Net Profit Margin – Net
profit margin measures how much
net income is generated as a percentage of total revenues received. According
to the Financials of DIMO, Net profit margin has been continuously improved and
it takes 1.9% for the year 2021/22. As a result of earning losses for the year
2018/19, Net Profit Margin takes negative figure.
Gross Profit Margin – This ratio indicates the percentage of each rupee of revenue
that the company retains as gross profit. Gross Profit Margin was
continuously improved throughout the last 5 years and it was increased to 27.7%
for the year 2021/22. This represents healthy performance of DIMO.
Return on Total assets
– This ratio represents how effectively
company uses its assets to generate earnings in terms of Total Assets. The
Company’s Returns on Assets recorded over 1.0% and this ratio improved to 1.9%
for the year 2021/22.
Return on Common
Shareholders’ Equity – This ratio measures the how success of a
company in generating income for the benefit of common stockholders. This ratio
is rapidly increased throughout last 5 years and for the year 2020/21, it
recorded as 4.3%.
Book Value per Common
Share – This ratio indicates a Company’s net
assets value on a per share basis. This ratio also increased throughout the
last 5 years and for the year 2021/22, it was recorded highest amount of Rs.
1,482.17 per share.
Basic Earnings per
Share – This ratio indicates how much profit
earned for each share of common stock outstanding. The Basic Earnings per Share
of the Company is continuously improved and it is recorded highest value of Rs.
63.15 per share for the year 2021/22.
iv.
Market Ratios
Ratio |
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
Price - Earnings Ratio (times) |
12.7 |
-12.7 |
8.6 |
10.9 |
7.7 |
Dividend Yield |
4.3% |
- |
1.0% |
0.5% |
2.6% |
Note:
For the Financial Year 2018/19, Dividends have not been declared.
Price – Earnings Ratio – P/E ratio shows what the market is willing to pay per
share based on earnings. The high P/E ratio indicates high share price relative
to earnings. As per the information, P/E Ratio of DIMO represents highest value
for the year 2017/18. But this ratio has dropped to 7.7 times for the year
2021/22. This mainly from the Market Value decreased during the year 2021/22
and as at March 31, 2022, Market value per share recorded as Rs. 488/=
Dividend Yield
- The Dividend Yield provides an idea of how well the company distributes its
profit to its Shareholders. A high dividend yield ratio indicates that the
company is distributing a better share of its profit to its shareholders. As
per the above data, highest dividend yield represents at the year 2017/18 and
for the year 2020/21, it has dropped to 0.5%. Further, it shows some
improvement in F/Y 2021/22 and it has increased to 2.6%.
8. ANALYSIS OF THE COMPANY USING ALTMAN’S Z
–SCORE MODEL
Altman’s Z-Score
model is a numerical measurement that is used to predict the chances of a
business going bankrupt in the next two years. The model was developed by
American finance professor Edward Altman in 1968 as a measure of the financial
stability of companies.Altman’s Z-score model is considered an effective method
of predicting the state of financial distress of any organization by using
multiple balance sheet values and corporate income.
The Z-score model is
based on five key financial ratios, and it relies on the information contained
in the 10-K report. It increases the
model’s accuracy when measuring the financial health of a company and its
probability of going bankrupt. The five ratios are as follow:
i.
Working Capital/Total Assets Ratio
ii.
Retained Earnings/ Total Assets Ratio
iii.
Earnings before Interest and Tax/ Total Assets Ratio
iv.
Market Value of Equity/ Total Liabilities Ratio
v.
Total Sales / Total Assets Ratio
The Sum of these ratios is considered as Z-score under this model
and interpretation based on Z-Score value can be illustrated as follow:
Usually, the lower the Z- score, the higher the odds
that a company is heading for bankruptcy. A Z-score that is lower than 1.8
means that the company is in financial distress and with a high probability of
going bankrupt. On the other hand, a score of 3 and above means that the company
is in a safe zone and is unlikely to file for bankruptcy. A score between 1.8
and 3 means that the company is in a grey area and with a moderate chance of
filing for bankruptcy.
Investors use Altman’s Z-score to make a decision on
whether to buy or sell a company’s stock, depending on the assessed financial
strength. If a company shows a Z-score closer to 3, investors can consider
purchasing the company’s stock since there is minimal risk of the business
going bankrupt in the next two years.
However, if a company shows a Z-score closer to 1.8,
the investors may consider selling the company’s stock to avoid losing their
investments since the score implies a high probability of going bankrupt.
Z-score calculation of DIMO using above model is as follow:
Financial Ratio |
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
Working Capital /Total Assets Ratio |
0.066 |
0.063 |
0.060 |
0.105 |
0.070 |
Retained Earnings / Total Assets Ratio |
0.407 |
0.402 |
0.391 |
0.487 |
0.400 |
Earnings before Interest & Tax/ Total assets Ratio |
0.051 |
0.040 |
0.050 |
0.043 |
0.088 |
Market Value of Equity/ Total Liabilities Ratio |
0.158 |
0.105 |
0.081 |
0.181 |
0.132 |
Total Sales/ Total Assets Ratio |
1.551 |
1.291 |
1.043 |
0.922 |
0.880 |
Z- Score
Value as the Altman’s Model |
2.233 |
1.902 |
1.625 |
1.738 |
1.569 |
|
Grey Zone |
Grey Zone |
Distress Zone |
Distress Zone |
Distress Zone |
As per the above calculation, Diesel and Motor
Engineering Company was at Gray Zone during the first financial years of
2017/18 and 2018/19. This has been converted to below 1.8 Z – Score value
during last financial years and there is a possibility to business going
bankrupt in the next two years. But considering the current economic and
financial crisis situation in Sri Lanka, this position can be expected from
every company. Therefore this situation is temporary and it will be changed
after normalization of Macro Economic variables in Sri Lanka.
9. CONCLUSION
The
main objective of the financial statement analysis of a company is to provide
the necessary information required by the internal and external stakeholders
for informative decision making, assessing the current and past performance of
the company, predicting the success or failure of the business, etc. The above
analysis provides detail analysis of Financial Statements of Diesel and Motor
Engineering PLC for the last 5 years using main analysis tools of Horizontal,
Vertical and Ratio Analysis.
According
to the horizontal analysis, Diesel and Motor Engineering PLC was able to obtain
continuous growth in Profit before Tax and Profit after Tax during last 5
years. Further it can be noted that Company was able to maintain strong
financial position while increasing its Total Assets. Accordingly DIMO was able
to increase its profitability last 2 years despite facing challenges of the
COVID -19 pandemic, current economic conditions and forex loss.
Vertical
analysis shows continuous growth in current assets proportion compared to Total
Assets and there is a decreasing trend in Non- Current Assets. It reflects
Company’s recent trend of short term assets financing via Long Term funds. This
working capital conservative approach will be threat to DIMO’s long term
profitability. Further it shows sudden decrease in Shareholders’ Equity
percentage end of the year 2021/22, it means that Company’s Total Liabilities
are in increasing trend.
As per the Trend Analysis, DIMO shows stable growth for the recent
years and it indicates that company was able to manage consequences arising
from COVID – 19 pandemic and current adverse economic conditions. But there is a
significant increase in Finance Cost and Long term Liabilities in last 2 years.
It indicates that Company is heavily depend on Long Term Liabilities and this
will be contributed to high insolvent risk. Further, there is a sudden improvement in
Intangible assets and Goodwill end of 2021/22.
According
to the Ratio Analysis, maintaining a healthy current ratio and quick assets
ratio reflect better management of liquidity and working capital of the Company.
It shows increasing trend in No. of Days’ uncollected and Days’ Sales in
Inventory during recent years, this may be as a result of current financial
crisis in the country. Therefore, DIMO should pay attention for the unusual
movement in working capital cycle. As previously mentioned that DIMO’s Debt
Ratio shows sudden growth end of the year 2021/22 and this leads to heavy debt
repayment. Further Times Interest Earned Ratio is also in decreasing trend and
this is mainly due to recent increases in finance cost.
Further,
Company was able to improve its Return on Assets and Return on Equity and it
indicates stability of the Company. Continuous increase in Earning per Share
(EPS) and Dividend per Share reflect capacity of the DIMO delivering long term
value to its shareholders. Market Ratios do not show continuous growth and
there are fluctuations in the market value of the DIMO. Therefore P/E ratio is
fluctuating throughout the last 5 years. But there is significant improvement
in Dividend Yield because of Company has declared more dividend in recent years
and DIMO has able to deliver maximum shareholders return.
Finally
as per Altman’s Z-Score Model, DIMO was at Gray Zone during the first financial years of 2017/18 and
2018/19. This has been converted to below 1.8 Z – Score value during last
financial years and there is a possibility to business going bankrupt in the
next two years. But considering the current economic and financial crisis
situation in Sri Lanka, this position can be expected from all of the companies
in Sri Lanka. But as per the above financials, DIMO has a large capacity to
face for current economic and financial crisis. Therefore this situation will
be improved after normalization of prevailing economic and financial crisis in
Sri Lanka.
No comments:
Post a Comment