1. Introduction
This report provides a
comparative analysis of financial performances over five years of one selected
company, namely Ceylon Cold Stores PLC. Business organizations can use various
analytical techniques such as horizontal analysis, vertical analysis, trend
analysis, common size analysis, ratio analysis and cash flow analysis to figure
out financial strengths and weaknesses. Similarly, this financial information
can be compared with past years budgeted or benchmarked values, intra company
(divisional) and inter company (industry) and with competitor company to get a
relative understanding. This assignment task intends to carry out horizontal,
vertical, trend analysis and intra company analysis. This comparison enables
financial users to make their decisions and ratio analysis provides the items
of the financial statements as comparative figures as ratios. Mainly this
assignment has used Liquidity and Efficiency ratios, Profitability ratios and
Solvency ratios, Market ratios with a relative analysis for Ceylon Cold Stores
PLC over past five-year time period.
1.1 BUILDING BLOCKS OF ANALYSIS
1.2 ADVANTAGES OF
ANALYSING FINANCIAL STATEMENT
·
Financial
statement analysis is a useful tool that has many advantages to Internal users
and External users to make better decisions.
·
It
provides investors with information about deciding to invest their funds in an
organization.
·
Governments
and regulatory authorities will be provided with an insight into whether the
organization meets the accounting principles.
·
Government
agencies can analyze what the organization’s tax liabilities are.
2. Overview of the Company
CCS
is a leader in Sri Lanka’s carbonated soft drinks and frozen confectionery
markets, offering an exciting array of products to discerning customers,
through its heritage brand ‘Elephant House’ and several emerging brands. Deep
industry insights gained over 15 decades of market strength have sharpened the
Company’s understanding of evolving customer preferences, enabling it to
consistently deliver great products through convenient and accessible channels.
CCS’s retail arm, Jaykay Marketing Services (Pvt) Ltd (JMSL) operates the
"Keells" Supermarkets chain, which has rapidly captured market share
through an expanding network of 96 outlets which have redefined industry
standards in customer convenience and service quality. The Group employs 5,849
personnel in its operations. CCS is part of John Keells Holdings PLC, Sri
Lanka’s premier diversified conglomerate and one of the most valuable entities
in the country in terms of market capitalization.
CCS’s
new state-of-the-art impulse-range ice cream factory is the largest ice cream
manufacturing facility in Sri Lanka and one of the most modern and
sophisticated in Asia. The facility features advanced technology, sophisticated
systems and environmentally-friendly manufacturing methods. In recent years we
have also directed concerted efforts towards driving operational efficiencies
across our manufacturing operations. In Retail, we have focused on enhancing
our overall customer experience through a holistic brand transformation which
comprised upgrading store layouts, introducing Prepared Food options, and
increased emphasis on freshness and value for money.
Financial
Capital
The
Group’s Financial Capital consists of the pool of funds available for its
utilization including shareholders’ equity, cash generated from operations and
borrowings. These financial resources are vital in funding our ambitious growth
plans, driving our strategic aspirations and creating sustainable value for all
our stakeholders.
3. Financial
Statement Analysis
Financial
statement analysis is an evaluative method of determining the past, current and
projected performance of a company. Several techniques are commonly used as
part of financial statement analysis including horizontal analysis, which
compares two or more years of financial data in both dollar and percentage
form; vertical analysis, where each category of accounts on the balance sheet
is shown as a percentage of the total account; and ratio analysis, which
calculates statistical relationships between data.
The
first method is the use of horizontal and vertical analysis. Horizontal
analysis is the comparison of financial information over a series of reporting
periods, while vertical analysis is the proportional analysis of a financial
statement, where each line item on a financial statement is listed as a
percentage of another item. Typically, this means that every line item on an
income statement is stated as a percentage of gross sales, while every line
item on a balance sheet is stated as a percentage of total assets. Thus,
horizontal analysis is the review of the results of multiple time periods,
while vertical analysis is the review of the proportion of accounts to each
other within a single period.
The
second method for analyzing financial statements is the use of many kinds of
ratios. We use ratios to calculate the relative size of one number in relation
to another. After we calculate a ratio, we can then compare it to the same
ratio calculated for a prior period, or that is based on an industry average,
to see if the company is performing in accordance with expectations. In a
typical financial statement analysis, most ratios will be within expectations,
while a small number will flag potential problems that will attract the
attention of the reviewer.
3.1
Horizontal Analysis
Horizontal
analysis is a financial statement analysis technique that shows changes in the
amounts of corresponding financial statement items over a period of time. It is
a useful tool to evaluate the trend situations. The statement for two or more
periods are used in horizontal analysis. The earliest period is usually used as
the base period and the items on the statements for all later periods are
compared with items on the statements of the base period. The changes are
generally shown both in Dollars and percentage.
Horizontal
analysis allows investors and analysts to see what has been driving a company’s
financial performance over a number of years, as well as spotting trends and
growth patterns such as seasonality. By looking at the income statement,
balance sheet and cash flow statement at the same time, one can create a
complete picture of operational results and see what has been driving a
company’s performance and whether it is operating efficiency and profitability.
In
considering the Ceylon Cold Stores PLC the historical analysis as shown in the
following table,
Dollar
change=Analysis period amount - Based period Amount
Percentage
change=Dollar change/Based period amount *100
Base
year – 2014
Dollar Change |
|||||
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
-280,894 |
-86,164 |
320,943 |
320,325 |
334,876 |
Lease rentals paid in advance |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Investment property |
8,975 |
25,922 |
121,560 |
143,119 |
168,552 |
Intangible assets |
(3,250) |
(6,187) |
(5,119) |
(8,071) |
(10,146) |
Investments in subsidiaries |
0 |
0 |
270,000 |
1,256,890 |
1,719,390 |
Investment in equity accounted investees |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Non-current financial assets |
17,464 |
33,311 |
44,025 |
5,474,823 |
7,105,752 |
Other non-current assets |
327 |
-599 |
5,933 |
35,762 |
42,244 |
Total non-current assets |
-257,378 |
(33,717) |
757,342 |
1,829,985 |
3,967,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
118,888 |
307,627 |
664,020 |
551,289 |
590,884 |
Trade and other receivables |
171,169 |
332,296 |
637,895 |
629,915 |
533,982 |
Amounts due from related parties |
(14,460) |
(6,527) |
(10,172) |
(6,689) |
9,515 |
Other current assets |
50,152 |
50,542 |
92,614 |
83,662 |
27,268 |
Short-term investments |
549,011 |
1,123,660 |
180,501 |
307,820 |
(129,235) |
Cash in hand and at bank |
(203,999) |
(143,763) |
(173,107) |
(34,794) |
2,757 |
Total current assets |
670,761 |
1,663,835 |
1,391,751 |
1,531,203 |
1,035,171 |
Total assets |
413,383 |
1,630,118 |
2,149,093 |
3,361,188 |
5,002,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
Stated capital |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Revenue reserves |
147,225 |
624,759 |
738,552 |
1,701,310 |
1,966,445 |
Other components of equity |
39,053 |
128,282 |
287,742 |
233,439 |
1,990,648 |
Total equity |
186,278 |
753,041 |
1,026,294 |
1,934,749 |
3,957,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Non - current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing loans and borrowings |
(101,264) |
(170,337) |
- |
- |
- |
Deferred tax liabilities |
74,969 |
118,392 |
172,293 |
404,831 |
428,102 |
Employee benefit liabilities
|
1,605 |
17,635 |
67,031 |
77,522 |
79,326 |
Other non-current liabilities |
(24,644) |
(11,155) |
50,381 |
29,837 |
(5,494) |
Total non-current liabilities |
(49,334) |
(45,465) |
104,368 |
326,853 |
316,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
7,430 |
339,009 |
369,986 |
521,311 |
514,000 |
Amounts due to related companies |
(4,915) |
(11,757) |
(9,738) |
(11,927) |
(7,600) |
Income tax liabilities |
287,028 |
496,955 |
387,655 |
110,236 |
117,074 |
Short-term borrowings |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Interest bearing loans and borrowings |
(38,334) |
(70,525) |
(124,598) |
- |
- |
Other current liabilities |
8,990 |
89,947 |
256,046 |
560,632 |
94,339 |
Bank overdrafts |
16,240 |
78,913 |
139,080 |
58,932 |
151,071 |
Total current liabilities |
276,439 |
922,542 |
1,018,431 |
1,099,586 |
729,286 |
Total equity and liabilities
|
413,383 |
1,630,118 |
2,149,093 |
3,361,188 |
5,002,976 |
Table 01: Dollar
change analysis of Balance Sheet (2015-2019)
Percent Change |
|||||
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
-7.39 |
-2.27 |
8.44 |
8.43 |
8.81 |
Lease rentals paid in advance |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10.50 |
30.32 |
142.21 |
167.43 |
197.18 |
|
Intangible assets |
-23.47 |
-44.68 |
-36.97 |
-58.29 |
-73.28 |
Investments in subsidiaries |
0.00 |
0.00 |
22.08 |
102.78 |
140.60 |
Investment in equity accounted investees |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Non-current financial assets |
37.12 |
70.79 |
93.56 |
11635.44 |
15101.59 |
Other non-current assets |
2.23 |
-4.09 |
40.49 |
244.08 |
288.32 |
Total non-current assets |
-2.43 |
-0.32 |
7.16 |
17.30 |
37.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
22.49 |
58.19 |
125.60 |
104.28 |
111.77 |
Trade and other receivables |
15.81 |
30.70 |
58.93 |
58.19 |
49.33 |
Amounts due from related parties |
-29.48 |
-13.31 |
-20.74 |
-13.64 |
19.40 |
Other current assets |
79.75 |
80.37 |
147.27 |
133.04 |
43.36 |
Short-term investments |
302.91 |
619.97 |
99.59 |
169.84 |
-71.30 |
Cash in hand and at bank |
-82.64 |
-58.24 |
-70.12 |
-14.09 |
1.12 |
Total current assets |
31.18 |
77.35 |
64.70 |
71.18 |
48.12 |
Total assets |
3.25 |
12.81 |
16.88 |
26.41 |
39.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
Stated capital |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Revenue reserves |
1.68 |
7.15 |
8.45 |
19.47 |
22.50 |
Other components of equity |
5.04 |
16.54 |
37.11 |
30.11 |
256.74 |
Total equity |
1.79 |
7.22 |
9.84 |
18.55 |
37.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Non - current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing loans and borrowings |
-54.64 |
-91.91 |
- |
- |
- |
Deferred tax liabilities |
17.08 |
26.97 |
39.24 |
92.21 |
97.51 |
Employee benefit liabilities
|
0.54 |
5.94 |
22.59 |
26.13 |
26.74 |
Other non-current liabilities |
-17.22 |
-7.80 |
35.21 |
20.85 |
-3.84 |
Total non-current liabilities |
-4.64 |
-4.27 |
9.81 |
30.72 |
29.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
1.17 |
53.17 |
58.03 |
81.77 |
80.62 |
Amounts due to related companies |
-37.77 |
-90.34 |
-74.83 |
-91.65 |
-58.40 |
Income tax liabilities |
840.10 |
1454.53 |
1134.62 |
322.65 |
342.66 |
Short-term borrowings |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Interest bearing loans and borrowings |
-27.46 |
-50.52 |
-89.25 |
- |
- |
Other current liabilities |
2.82 |
28.18 |
80.22 |
175.65 |
29.56 |
Bank overdrafts |
18.18 |
88.36 |
155.73 |
65.99 |
169.16 |
Total current liabilities |
22.42 |
74.83 |
82.61 |
89.19 |
59.16 |
Total equity and liabilities
|
3.25 |
12.81 |
16.88 |
26.41 |
39.30 |
Table 02: Percent
change analysis of Balance Sheet (2015-2019)
The
horizontal analysis shows that the significant increase of Property, plant and equipment from 2015 to 2019.
However,
it recorded a negative amount in 2015 and 2016. Then it is continuously increase
in 2018 and 2019. In considering the Investment property, it shows the
significant increasing from 2015 to 2019. It recorded high amount in 2019.
Investments
in subsidiaries is increase in 2017 and drastically increases in 2018 and 2019.
However,
considering the total asset it shows that it increases considerably the study
period. It is good sign of the company. Almost all type of assets is increasing
and some assets are decreasing throughout the study period however the total
assets show positive increase compared with the base year.
Then
it is needed to analysis the nature of the liabilities throughout the period. Payable
plays a significant increase during the study period. It recorded 1.17 value in
2015 however it is sharp increase after 2015. It shows that Employee benefit liabilities
increases compared with the based year. It increases from 0.54 to 26.74. Income tax liabilities
shows high percentages up to 2017 and in 2018 it shows the least amount. If we
consider about the Bank overdrafts from 2015 to 2017 it shows high
increment but it decreases in 2018 and again show the highest percentage in 2019.
However,
the overall figure show that total equity and liabilities increase gradually
from 2015 to 2019 compared with the base year.
3.2
Trend Analysis
Trend
analysis is the process of comparing business data over time to identify any
consistent results or trends. Trend analysis helps to understand how the
business has performed and predict where current business operations and
practices. It will give the ideas about how might change things to move
business in the right direction.
Trend
analysis to help improve business by:
·
identifying areas where your business is
performing well
·
identifying areas where the business is
underperforming
·
providing evidence to decision making.
Trend
Period= (Analysis period amount /Base period amount) *100
1.2.1
Trend analysis of Balance Sheet
Trend Analysis |
||||||
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
100 |
93 |
98 |
108 |
108 |
109 |
Lease rentals paid in advance |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
100 |
110 |
130 |
242 |
267 |
297 |
|
100 |
77 |
55 |
63 |
42 |
27 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
100 |
100 |
100 |
122 |
203 |
241 |
Investment in equity accounted investees |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
- |
- |
Non-current financial assets |
100 |
137 |
171 |
194 |
11,735 |
15,202 |
Other non-current assets |
100 |
102 |
96 |
140 |
344 |
388 |
Total non-current assets |
100 |
98 |
100 |
107 |
117 |
138 |
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
100 |
122 |
158 |
226 |
204 |
212 |
Trade and other receivables |
100 |
116 |
131 |
159 |
158 |
149 |
Amounts due from related parties |
100 |
71 |
87 |
79 |
86 |
119 |
Other current assets |
100 |
180 |
180 |
247 |
233 |
143 |
Short-term investments |
100 |
403 |
720 |
200 |
270 |
29 |
100 |
17 |
42 |
30 |
86 |
101 |
|
Total current assets |
100 |
131 |
177 |
165 |
171 |
148 |
Total assets |
100 |
103 |
113 |
117 |
126 |
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated capital |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Revenue reserves |
100 |
102 |
107 |
108 |
119 |
123 |
Other components of equity |
100 |
105 |
117 |
137 |
130 |
357 |
Total equity |
100 |
102 |
107 |
110 |
119 |
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non - current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing loans and borrowings |
100 |
45 |
8 |
- |
- |
- |
Deferred tax liabilities |
100 |
117 |
127 |
139 |
192 |
198 |
100 |
101 |
106 |
123 |
126 |
127 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
100 |
83 |
92 |
135 |
121 |
96 |
Total non-current liabilities |
100 |
95 |
96 |
110 |
131 |
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
100 |
101 |
153 |
158 |
182 |
181 |
Amounts due to related companies |
100 |
62 |
10 |
25 |
8 |
42 |
Income tax liabilities |
100 |
940 |
1,555 |
1,235 |
423 |
443 |
Short-term borrowings |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Interest bearing loans and borrowings |
100 |
73 |
49 |
11 |
- |
- |
Other current liabilities |
100 |
103 |
128 |
180 |
276 |
130 |
Bank overdrafts |
100 |
118 |
188 |
256 |
166 |
269 |
Total current liabilities |
100 |
122 |
175 |
183 |
189 |
159 |
100 |
103 |
113 |
117 |
126 |
139 |
Table
03: Trend
analysis of Balance Sheet (2015-2019)
Trend
Analysis- Assets
The
following figures show the behavior of the assets throughout of the study
period. Property, plant and equipment recorded same percentage in 2015 and 2016
also 2017 and 2018. Intangible assets drastically decrease in 2015, 2016 and
then increase in 2017, then it again decreases in 2018 to 2019.
In
considering the Receivables, increase up to 2017 and loan and decrease in 2018
and 2019. Investment property and Cash in hand and at bank also increase
throughout the study period. It considering the total asset it recorded the
increment throughout the period.
Trend
Analysis- Liabilities
In
considering the deferred tax liabilities and employee benefit liabilities are
increase slightly. However, the trade and other payables increase till 2018
then decrease slightly in 2019. Bank overdrafts is increase
till 2017 then it decreases in 2018 and again increase in 2019. The total
equity and liabilities figure shows that slight increase during the study
period.
Graph 01: Trend analysis
of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC total non-current assets and total current assets
(2014-2019)
Graph 02: Trend analysis
of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC total assets, total equity and total liabilities
(2014-2019)
Graph 02 shows the total
change of the trend of the total assets, total equity, total liabilities on Ceylon
Cold Stores PLC during 2014 to 2019. The graph depicts that the same pattern of
change in assets and equity during 2014 to 2019. Total liabilities shown large
percentage in 2018.
3.2.2
Trend analysis of Income Statement
|
Trend Analysis (%) |
|||||
Year |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Total revenue |
100.00 |
110.25 |
137.59 |
157.69 |
154.05 |
131.21 |
Cost of sales |
100.00 |
104.79 |
122.53 |
139.48 |
148.10 |
127.58 |
Gross profit |
100.00 |
122.96 |
172.69 |
200.11 |
167.91 |
139.66 |
Table
03: Trend
analysis of Income Statement – Revenue, Cost of sales and Gross profit
(2015-2019)
The
trend analysis is analyzing series of account data over the period of time,
baselining 100 as a selected year. This method is useful to graph the changes
in absolute cost and values shown in financial statement. In this study,
revenue, cost of sales and gross profit of the Ceylon Cold Stores PLC was
analyzed using trend analysis which was used company’s financial statements of
last five years such as 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 as got 2014 the baselining
for 100%.
Graph 03: Trend analysis
of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC total revenue, cost of sales and gross profit
(2014-2019)
The
Revenue trends are shown in table 03, increased in years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018
and 2019 by 10, 38, 58,54 and 31 respectively while Gross profit trends have
increased in 2015, 2016 2017, 2018 and 2019 by 23, 73, 100, 68 and 40
respectively. In 2017 reported the highest gross profit throughout the period.
3.3
Vertical Analysis
Vertical
analysis is a method of financial statement analysis in which each line item is
listed as a percentage of a base figure within the statement. Thus, line items
on an income statement can be stated as a percentage of gross sales, while line
items on a balance sheet can be stated as a percentage of total assets or
liabilities, and vertical analysis of a cash flow statement shows each cash
inflow or outflow as a percentage of the total cash inflows. Vertical analysis
makes it easier to understand the correlation between single items on a balance
sheet and the bottom line, expressed in a percentage. Vertical analysis can
become a more potent tool when used in conjunction with horizontal analysis,
which considers the finances of a certain period of time.
3.3.1
Vertical analysis of Balance Sheet-Assets
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment |
26.8 |
25.9 |
27.7 |
25.6 |
23.3 |
Lease rentals paid in
advance |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Investment property |
0.7 |
0.8 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
Intangible
assets |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Investments in
subsidiaries |
9.3 |
8.5 |
10.0 |
15.4 |
16.6 |
Investment in equity
accounted investees |
41.0 |
37.6 |
36.2 |
- |
- |
Non-current financial
assets |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
34.3 |
40.3 |
Other non-current
assets |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
Total non-current
assets |
78.5 |
73.4 |
76.2 |
77.1 |
82.0 |
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
4.9 |
5.8 |
8.0 |
6.7 |
6.3 |
Trade and other
receivables |
9.5 |
9.9 |
11.6 |
10.6 |
9.1 |
Amounts due from
related parties |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
Other current assets |
0.9 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.5 |
Short-term
investments |
5.6 |
9.1 |
2.4 |
3.0 |
0.3 |
Cash in hand and at
bank |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
Total current
assets |
21.5 |
26.6 |
23.8 |
22.9 |
18.0 |
Total assets |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Table
04: Vertical analysis of Balance Sheet-Assets (2015-2019)
In
considering the vertical analysis the property, plant and equipment represent
the 26.8 from the total assets. But it shows a slightly decrease in 2016, increase
in 2017 and again decrease in 2018 and 2019.
In considering the amount of investment in subsidiaries increase throughout
the period. Investment
in equity accounted investees reported the highest value compared
with the total value in 2015 to 2017 and non-current financial assets indicates
the highest percentage in assets in 2018-2019.
Graph 04: Graphical
analysis of common size assets for 2019
Graph 05: Graphical
analysis of common size assets for 2018
Graph
07: Graphical analysis of common size assets for 2016
Graph
08: Graphical analysis of common size assets for 2015
|
Common-size percent (%) |
||||
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Equity attributable to
equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
Stated capital |
7.0 |
6.4 |
6.2 |
5.7 |
5.2 |
Revenue reserves |
67.6 |
65.2 |
63.7 |
64.9 |
60.4 |
Other components of
equity |
6.2 |
6.3 |
7.1 |
6.3 |
15.6 |
Total equity |
80.8 |
77.9 |
77.0 |
76.9 |
81.1 |
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Non - current
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing loans
and borrowings |
0.6 |
0.1 |
- |
- |
- |
Deferred tax
liabilities |
3.9 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
5.2 |
4.9 |
Employee benefit
liabilities |
2.3 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
2.3 |
2.1 |
Other non-current
liabilities |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
Total non-current
liabilities |
7.7 |
7.1 |
7.9 |
8.6 |
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other
payables |
4.9 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
7.2 |
6.5 |
Amounts due to related
companies |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Income tax liabilities |
2.4 |
3.7 |
2.8 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
Short-term borrowings |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.8 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
- |
- |
|
Other current
liabilities |
2.5 |
2.8 |
3.9 |
5.5 |
2.3 |
Bank overdrafts |
0.8 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
1.4 |
Total current
liabilities |
11.5 |
15.0 |
15.1 |
14.5 |
11.1 |
Total equity and
liabilities |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Table
05: Vertical analysis of Balance Sheet- Equity and Liabilities (2015-2019)
In
considering the liability, deferred tax liabilities represent 3.9 in 2015, 2016
and it increase 4.1, 5.2 in 2017, 2018 and again decrease to 4.9 in 2019. Interest
bearing loans and borrowings is quite low amount compared with the other
liability. Payables also giving a considerable amount of percentage.
In
considering the stated capital represents the 7% of the total equity while
revenue reserves represented 67.6% from the total equity. However, the both
decreasing throughout the period. The payable amount is quite low it is good
remark of the company.
3.3.2
Vertical analysis of Income
Common-size
percent |
|||||
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
2015 |
|
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
|
Total revenue |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Cost of sales |
-68.0 |
-67.3 |
-61.9 |
-62.3 |
-66.5 |
Gross profit |
32.0 |
32.7 |
38.1 |
37.7 |
33.5 |
Dividend income |
6.1 |
5.5 |
5.3 |
2.4 |
- |
Other operating
income |
2.4 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
Selling and
distribution expenses |
-14.2 |
-10.3 |
-9.3 |
-10.2 |
-11.2 |
Administrative
expenses |
-5.8 |
-4.7 |
-4.1 |
-3.8 |
-4.3 |
Other operating
expenses |
-2.8 |
-2.4 |
-2.8 |
-2.4 |
-2.6 |
Results from
operating activities |
17.7 |
21.3 |
28.0 |
24.2 |
16.4 |
Finance cost |
-0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-0.1 |
-0.2 |
Finance income |
0.4 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
Net finance
income/(cost) |
0.3 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
0.2 |
Change in fair value
of investment property |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Share of results of
equity accounted investees |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Profit before tax |
18.2 |
22.2 |
29.7 |
25.0 |
16.7 |
Tax expense |
-3.7 |
-4.7 |
-6.9 |
-6.3 |
-4.6 |
Profit for the year |
14.5 |
17.4 |
22.7 |
18.7 |
12.0 |
Table
06: Vertical analysis of Income Statement (2015-2019)
Graph
08: Graphical analysis of common size income statement for 2019
Graph
09: Graphical analysis of common size income statement for 2018
Graph
10: Graphical analysis of common size income statement for 2017
Graph
11: Graphical analysis of common size income statement for 2016
Graph
12: Graphical analysis of common size income statement for 2015
3.4 Ratio Analysis
3.4.1
LIQUIDITY AND EFFICIENCY RATIOS
Liquidity
ratios measure a company’s ability to meet its maturing short-term obligations.
In other words, can a company quickly convert its assets to cash without a loss
in value if necessary, to meet its short-term obligations. Favorable liquidity
ratios are critical to a company and its creditors within a business or
industry that does not provide a steady and predictable cash flow. They are
also a key predictor of a company’s ability to make timely payments to
creditors and to continue to meet obligations to lenders when faced with an
unforeseen event.
Working
Capital
Working
capital is the money used to cover all of a company's short-term expenses,
including inventory, payments on short-term debt, and day-to-day expenses called
operating expenses. Working capital is critical since it is used to keep a
business operating smoothly and meet all its financial obligations within the
coming year.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Current Assets (Rs.
'000) |
2,821,927 |
3,815,001 |
3,542,917 |
3,682,369 |
3,186,337 |
Current Liabilities (Rs.
'000) |
1,509,265 |
2,155,368 |
2,251,257 |
2,332,412 |
1,962,112 |
Working Capital (Rs.
'000) |
1,312,662 |
1,659,633 |
1,291,660 |
1,349,957 |
1,224,225 |
Table
07: Working capital of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
I.
CURRENT RATIO
This
ratio reflects the number of times short-term assets cover short-term
liabilities and is a fairly accurate indication of a company's ability to
service its current obligations. A higher number is preferred because it
indicates a strong ability to service short-term obligations. The composition
of current assets is a key factor in the evaluation of this ratio.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Current Assets (Rs.
'000) |
2,821,927 |
3,815,001 |
3,542,917 |
3,682,369 |
3,186,337 |
Current Liabilities (Rs.
'000) |
1,509,265 |
2,155,368 |
2,251,257 |
2,332,412 |
1,962,112 |
Current Assets/Current
Liabilities |
1.87 |
1.77 |
1.57 |
1.58 |
1.62 |
Current Ratio |
1.87 : 1 |
1.77 : 1 |
1.57 : 1 |
1.58 : 1 |
1.62 : 1 |
Depending
on the type of business or industry, current assets may include slow-moving
inventories that could potentially affect analysis of a company's liquidity how
long could it potentially take to convert raw materials and inventory into
finished products. (For this reason, the
acid test ratio may be preferable to the current ratio because it eliminates
inventory and prepaid expenses from this ratio for a more accurate gauge of a
company's liquidity and ability to meet short-term obligations.)
Table 08: Current ratio of Ceylon
Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph
13: Current ratio of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
In 2015 the Ceylon Cold Stores PLC’s current ratio was the highest which was 1.87. We
can see from graph the current ratio is fluctuated over the year. At 2017
current ratio was lowest.
II.
ACID-TEST RATIO
This
ratio, also known as the quick ratio, measures immediate liquidity - the number
of times cash, accounts receivable, and marketable securities cover short-term
obligations. A higher number is preferred because it suggests a company has a
strong ability to service short-term obligations. This ratio is a more reliable
variation of the current ratio because inventory, prepaid expenses, and other
less liquid current assets are removed from the calculation.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Current Assets |
2,821,927 |
3,815,001 |
3,542,917 |
3,682,369 |
3,186,337 |
Inventories |
647,564 |
836,303 |
1,192,696 |
1,079,965 |
1,119,560 |
Quick Assets |
2,174,363 |
2,978,698 |
2,350,221 |
2,602,404 |
2,066,777 |
Current Liabilities |
1,509,265 |
2,155,368 |
2,251,257 |
2,332,412 |
1,962,112 |
Quick Assets / Current Liabilities |
1.44 |
1.38 |
1.04 |
1.12 |
1.05 |
Acid Test Ratio |
1.44 : 1 |
1.38 : 1 |
1.04 : 1 |
1.12 : 1 |
1.05 : 1 |
Table
09: Acid test ratio of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph
14: Acid test ratio of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
The
Acid test ratios are changing slightly in 2015 to 2019. In 2015 shows the
highest acid test ratio as well as the current ratio. When there is
considerable difference between acid test ratio and current ratio, can create
cash flow problems.
III.
ACCOUNT RECIEVABLE TURNOVER
This
ratio measures the number of times receivables turn over in a year and reveals
how successful a company is in collecting its outstanding receivables. A higher
number is preferred because it indicates a shorter time between sales and cash
collection.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Sales (Rs. '000) |
9,768,129 |
12,190,925 |
13,971,391 |
13,649,255 |
11,625,320 |
Account Receivables (Rs.
'000) |
1,253,607 |
1,414,734 |
1,720,333 |
1,712,353 |
1,616,420 |
Average receivables (Rs.
'000) |
1168022.5 |
1334170.5 |
1567533.5 |
1716343 |
1664386.5 |
Sales/Average
Receivables |
8.36 |
9.14 |
8.91 |
7.95 |
6.98 |
Accounts Receivable
Turnover |
8.36 times |
9.14 times |
8.91 times |
7.95 times |
6.98 times |
Table 10: Accounts receivable turnover of Ceylon Cold
Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph
15: Accounts receivable turnover of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
According
to the table which depicts that the rate which company converts its receivables
into cash is preferred. Because it shows continuous decrease during past four
years.
IV.
MERCHANDISE TURNOVER
This
ratio measures the number of times merchandise is sold and replaced during the
year. A higher number is preferred because it indicates a shorter time between
merchandise sold and replaced during the year.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Cost
of sales (Rs. '000) |
6,495,652 |
7,595,030 |
8,645,685 |
9,180,421 |
7,908,379 |
Inventories
(Rs. '000) |
647,564 |
836,303 |
1,192,696 |
1,079,965 |
1,119,560 |
Average
Inventory (Rs. '000) |
588120 |
741933.5 |
1014499.5 |
1136330.5 |
1099762.5 |
cost
of sales / average inventory |
11.04 |
10.24 |
8.52 |
8.08 |
7.19 |
Merchandise
Turnover |
11.04 times |
10.24 times |
8.52 times |
8.08 times |
7.19 times |
Table 11: Merchandise turnover of Ceylon Cold Stores
PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph
16: Merchandise turnover of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
In
2015, Merchandise turnover was 11.04 times. It seen that the company’s
merchandise turnover gradually decreased and reached its lowest point at 2019.
V.
DAY’S SALES UNCOLLECTED
This
ratio indicates that the average how many days it takes to collect an accounts
receivable or number of times debtors will pay money. If the days are high this
indicates that there is poor credit control by the management of the company.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Account Receivables (Rs.
'000) |
1,253,607 |
1,414,734 |
1,720,333 |
1,712,353 |
1,616,420 |
Net Sales (Rs. '000) |
9,768,129 |
12,190,925 |
13,971,391 |
13,649,255 |
11,625,320 |
Account Receivable/Net
Sales*365 |
46.84 |
42.36 |
44.94 |
45.79 |
50.75 |
Days' Sales Uncollected |
46.84 Days |
42.36 Days |
44.94 Days |
45.79 Days |
50.75 Days |
Table 12: Day’s sales uncollected of Ceylon Cold
Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph
17: Day’s sales uncollected of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
Day’s
sales uncollected period is decreased in 2016 and after 2016 average day’s
sales uncollected period increased which can create cash flow problem. In 2019
it shows the highest days and it will be not good for the company,
VI.
DAY’S SALES IN INVENTORY
This
ratio measures the average number of days a company's receivables are
outstanding. A lower number of days is desired. An increase in the number of
days’ receivables is outstanding indicates an increased possibility of late
payment by customers. Companies should attempt to reduce the number of days’
sales in Inventory in order to increase cash flow. The general rule used is that the time
allowed for payment by the selling terms should not be exceeded by more than 10
or 15 days.
Year |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
2015 |
Ending Inventory |
1,119,560 |
1,079,965 |
1,192,696 |
836,303 |
647,564 |
Cost of sales |
7,908,379 |
9,180,421 |
8,645,685 |
7,595,030 |
6,495,652 |
Ending Inventory/Cost of Sales*365 |
51.67 |
42.94 |
50.35 |
40.19 |
36.39 |
Days Sales in Inventory |
51.67 Days |
42.94 Days |
50.35 Days |
40.19 Days |
36.39 Days |
Table 13: Day’s sales in inventory of Ceylon Cold
Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph
18: Day’s sales in inventory of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
This
shows that Ceylon Cold Stores PLC is having highest number in 2019 and lowest
number is on 2015. According to above figures, Ceylon Cold Stores PLC has taken
average 44.3 days to company’s receivables are outstanding. It shows unfavorable
condition for the company.
VII.
TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER
This
ratio measures the firm’s ability to generate sales from its assets. This
includes all assets company has and if higher this value is the more
efficiently the company is producing sales.
Year |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
2015 |
Revenue (Rs. '000) |
11,625,320 |
13,649,255 |
13,971,391 |
12,190,925 |
9,768,129 |
Total assets (Rs.
'000) |
17,732,291 |
16,090,503 |
14,878,408 |
14,359,433 |
13,142,698 |
Average Total Assets (Rs.
'000) |
16911397 |
15484455.5 |
14618920.5 |
13751065.5 |
12936006.5 |
Revenue/Average Total
Assets |
0.69 |
0.88 |
0.96 |
0.89 |
0.76 |
Total Assets Turnover |
0.69 times |
0.88 times |
0.96 times |
0.89 times |
0.76 times |
Table 13: Total assets turnover of Ceylon Cold Stores
PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph 18: Total assets
turnover of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
The
highest total asset turnover was at 2017 and which depicts every 1rp spent
generated 0.83rps of sales. Ceylon Cold Stores PLC is having total assets
turnover less than 1, which can be identified as company is not having much
efficiency. It shows that total assets turnover has reduced from 2017 to 2019. The
company should give special attention for the total assets turnover of the
company during future years.
3.4.2
SOLVENCY RATIOS
Solvency
ratios measure an organization’s ability to meet their long-term interest
expenses and repayment obligations.
I.
DEBT RATIO
This
ratio measures what proportion of debt a company is carrying relative to its
assets. A ratio value greater than one indicates a company has more debt than
assets. Naturally, companies and creditors prefer a lower number.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Total Liabilities (Rs. '000) |
2,524,052 |
3,174,024 |
3,419,746 |
3,723,386 |
3,342,830 |
Total assets (Rs. '000) |
13,142,698 |
14,359,433 |
14,878,408 |
16,090,503 |
17,732,291 |
Total Liabilities/Total Assets*100 |
19.20 |
22.10 |
22.98 |
23.14 |
18.85 |
Debt Ratio |
19.20% |
22.10% |
22.98% |
23.14% |
18.85% |
Table 14: Debt ratio of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from
2015 to 2019
Graph 19: Debt ratio of
Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
From
2015 to 2018 Debt ratio increased every year. But at 2019 it decreased; it was
a good sign to company. The highest debt ratio was 23.14% in the year 2018.
II.
EQUITY RATIO
This
ratio measures what proportion of total assets was provided by the owner’s
equity. The higher the number the more total capital has been contributed by
owners and the less by creditors.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Total Shareholders' Equity (Rs. '000) |
10,618,646 |
11,185,409 |
11,458,662 |
12,367,117 |
14,389,461 |
Total assets (Rs. '000) |
13,142,698 |
14,359,433 |
14,878,408 |
16,090,503 |
17,732,291 |
Total Equity/Total Assets*100 |
80.80 |
77.90 |
77.02 |
76.86 |
81.15 |
Equity Ratio |
80.80% |
77.90% |
77.02% |
76.86% |
81.15% |
Table 15: Equity ratio of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from
2015 to 2019
Graph 19: Equity ratio of
Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
As
per above details it shows that Equity ratio was decrease from 2015 to 2018 and
it shows that Equity ratio has increased by high percentage during 2019, so it
shows unfavorable condition in 2016-2018 and favorable in 2019 for the
investment in company shares.
III.
TIMES INTEREST EARNED
This
is the most common measure of the ability of a firm’s operations to provide
protection to the long-term creditors. A higher number is preferred.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Net Income before
interest expense and income tax (Rs. '000) |
1,600,990 |
2,948,822 |
3,916,707 |
2,900,770 |
2,053,472 |
Interest Expense (Rs.
'000) |
18,438 |
87,417 |
134,745 |
102,815 |
35,457 |
Times Interest Earned |
86.83 |
33.73 |
29.07 |
28.21 |
57.91 |
Table 16: Times interest earned of Ceylon Cold Stores
PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph 20: Times interest
earned of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
Times Interest Earned ratio lowest point is 28.21
times in 2018. In 2016 ratio was decreased suddenly and after 2018 it was
increased again.
3.4.3
PROFITABILITY RATIOS
Profitability
ratios measure a company’s ability to use its capital or assets to generate
profits. Improving profitability is a constant challenge for all companies and
their management. Evaluating profitability ratios is a key component in
determining the success of a company.
I.
PROFIT MARGIN
This
ratio measures how much profit a company makes on each sales dollar received
and how well a company could potentially deal with higher costs or lower sales
in the future.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Net Income (Rs. '000) |
1,176,398 |
2,281,013 |
3,177,141 |
2,376,870 |
1,686,554 |
Net Sales (Rs. '000) |
9,768,129 |
12,190,925 |
13,971,391 |
13,649,255 |
11,625,320 |
Net Income/Net Sales*100 |
12.04 |
18.71 |
22.74 |
17.41 |
14.51 |
Profit Margin |
12.04% |
18.71% |
22.74% |
17.41% |
14.51% |
Table 17: Profit margin of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from
2015 to 2019
Graph 21: Profit margin of
Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
From the graph we can see
the company’s profit increased up to 2015 to 2017 and decreased again. So, it
is not good condition to company.
II.
GROSS MARGIN
This
ratio measures the gross profit earned on sales and reports how much of each
sales dollar is available to cover operating expenses and contribute to
profits.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Net Sales (Rs.
'000) |
9,768,129 |
12,190,925 |
13,971,391 |
13,649,255 |
11,625,320 |
Cost of Sales (Rs.
'000) |
6,495,652 |
7,595,030 |
8,645,685 |
9,180,421 |
7,908,379 |
Gross Profit (Rs.
'000) |
3,272,477 |
4,595,895 |
5,325,706 |
4,468,834 |
3,716,941 |
Gross Profit/Net
Sales*100 |
33.50 |
37.70 |
38.12 |
32.74 |
31.97 |
Gross Margin |
33.50% |
37.70% |
38.12% |
32.74% |
31.97% |
Table 18: Gross margin of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from
2015 to 2019
Graph 22: Gross margin of
Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
According
to the data of the above table which depicts that the gross profit margin has
several fluctuations from 2015 to 2019 and year 2017 marked the highest gross
profit margin. During 2019 the gross profit margin was the lowest profit margin
of these five years.
There
is a fluctuation in gross profit margin which can be considered as the
increased cost of the company not passed on proportionately to customers by an
increase price. This can be concluded that the company is not in a favorable
situation sale its inventory or merchandise.
III.
RETURN ON TOTAL ASSETS
This
ratio measures how effectively a company's assets are being used to generate
profits. It is one of the most important ratios when evaluating the success of
a business. A higher number reflects a well-managed company with a healthy
return on assets. Heavily depreciated assets, a large number of intangible
assets, or any unusual income or expenses can easily distort this calculation.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Net Income (Rs. '000) |
1,176,398 |
2,281,013 |
3,177,141 |
2,376,870 |
1,686,554 |
Average Total Assets (Rs. '000) |
588199 |
1728705.5 |
2729077 |
2777005.5 |
2031712 |
Net Income/Average total Assets*100 |
17.90 |
16.59 |
21.73 |
15.35 |
9.97 |
Return on Total Assets |
17.90% |
16.59% |
21.73% |
15.35% |
9.97% |
Table 19: Return on total assets of Ceylon Cold Stores
PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph 23: Return on total
assets of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
According
to the above table, overall profitability of the company has changes over
five-year period. The dramatic increment at 2017 and decrease the return on
total assets from 21.73% to 9.97% suggests that the transfer of funds from
investment to a portfolio of operating assets has been more than successful.
IV.
RETURN ON COMMON SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
This
ratio expresses the rate of return on equity capital employed and measures the
ability of a company's management to realize an adequate return on the capital
invested by the owners in a company. A higher number is preferred for this
commonly analyzed ratio.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Net Income (Rs. '000) |
1,176,398 |
2,281,013 |
3,177,141 |
2,376,870 |
1,686,554 |
Preferred Dividends |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Average Shareholder's Equity (Rs. '000) |
10525507 |
10902027.5 |
11322035.5 |
11912889.5 |
13378289 |
(Net Income-Preferred Dividends)/ Average Shareholder's
Equity*100 |
11.18 |
20.92 |
28.06 |
19.95 |
12.61 |
Return on Common shareholder's equity |
11.18% |
20.92% |
28.06% |
19.95% |
12.61% |
Table 20: Return on
common shareholders equity of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph 23: Return on
common shareholders’ equity of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
According
to above table, which indicate that due to increasing ratio from 2015 to 2017
the way that the company used owner’s investment to earn income was favorable.
But from 2017 to 2019 it showed decrease in ratio which can be unfavorable for
the investors to invest on this company in future.
V.
BOOK VALUE FOR COMMON SHARE
This ratio measures liquidation at reported amount.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
shareholders equity applicable to common
shares (Rs. '000) |
10,656,336 |
12,345,731 |
13,189,398 |
13,682,773 |
15,399,958 |
Number of Common Shares Outstanding ('000) |
95,040 |
95,040 |
95,040 |
95,040 |
95,040 |
Book Value per Common Share |
112.12 |
129.90 |
138.78 |
143.97 |
162.04 |
Table 21: Book value for
common share of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph 24: Book value for
common share of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
The
Book value for common share ratio attempts to identify undervalued or
overvalued securities. From 2015 to 2019 book value for common share ratios
were increased gradually.
VI.
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
This measure indicates
how much income was earned for each share of common stock outstanding.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Net Income (Rs. '000) |
1,525,495 |
2,874,873 |
3,552,903 |
2,567,455 |
1,310,165 |
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
('000) |
95,040 |
95,040 |
95,040 |
95,040 |
95,040 |
Net Income/ Weighted Average Common Shares |
16.05 |
30.25 |
37.38 |
27.01 |
13.79 |
Basic Earnings per share |
16.05 per share |
30.25 per share |
37.38 per share |
27.01 per share |
13.79 per share |
Table 22: Basic earnings
per share of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph 25: Basic earnings
per share of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
From
the view of time series analysis, Basic earnings per share of Ceylon Cold
Stores PLC was increased gradually for 2015 to 2017, but after 2017 to now it
was decreased, so it is a not good sign to company.
3.4.4
MARKET
RATIOS
I.
PRICE EARNINGS RATIO
This
measure is often used by investors as a general guideline in gauging stock
values. Generally, the higher the price-earnings ratio, the more opportunity a
company has for growth.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Market Price Per Share (Rs.) |
298.20 |
430.00 |
811.00 |
950.00 |
575.00 |
Earnings Per Share (Rs.) |
16.05 |
30.25 |
37.38 |
27.01 |
13.79 |
Market Price Per Share/ Earnings Per Share |
18.58 |
14.22 |
21.69 |
35.17 |
41.71 |
Price -Earnings Ratio |
18.58 times |
14.22 times |
21.69 times |
35.17 times |
41.71 times |
Table 23: Price earnings
ratio of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph 26: Price earnings
ratio of Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
II.
DIVIDEND YIELD
This
ratio identifies the return, in terms of cash dividends on the current market
price of the stock.
Year |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
Annual Dividends Per Share (Rs.) |
11.00 |
18.00 |
32.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
Market Price Per Share (Rs.) |
298.20 |
430.00 |
811.00 |
950.00 |
575.00 |
Annual Dividends Per Share/Market Price Per
Share*100 |
3.69 |
4.19 |
3.95 |
1.58 |
2.61 |
Dividend yield |
3.69% |
4.19% |
3.95% |
1.58% |
2.61% |
Table 24: Dividend yield of
Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
Graph 27: Dividend yield of
Ceylon Cold Stores PLC from 2015 to 2019
4.
Conclusion
After the 2017 the Ceylon Cold Stores recorded not much good
performance and decreased the profitability up to 2019. The return on total
assets and return on common shareholders’ equity ratios showed the same pattern.
In considering the account of the EPS decreased from 37 to 14 between 2017 to
2019. It is a considerable decrement. The total revenue and net interest income are
considerable increase up to 2017 and decrease up to 2019. Total revenue decreases
2 million from 2018 to 2019.However net income is decrease by Rs. 690,316 in
2019 compared with the 2018. However, from 2016 to 2019 Price earnings ratios
were increasing gradually, so it is good sign for the company.
Ceylon Cold Stores
PLC has come up with a fluctuating current ratio in the last five years. So,
the company should improve and maintain its current ratio so that it can meet
the short-term obligations smoothly. The firms do not maintain a stable
liquidity position over the last five years. Therefore, maintaining proper
liquidity funds like cash and bank balance is suggested. The firm should
enhance employee’s efficiency, more training to its employees in order to
increase their production capacity and minimize mistakes while doing tasks. The
firms should have a check in the manufacturing process to provide better
products.
This
study can be concluded that the company should give special attention on company’s
existing credit policy and as well as market strategies to develop the profit
of the company.
No comments:
Post a Comment